Flaming infraction from farcast.

[I'm Still Breathing]

Dear I'm Still Breathing,

You have received an infraction for Flaming for the content of this post: [post]6038003[/post]

-------
If you have nothing constructive to say about someone elected, best to not say anything at all. Bringing up irrelevant spam forum posts to attack someone is frowned upon.
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s).

Accumulating five infractions within a month will result in a two-week ban; accumulating seven infractions in a month will result in a month-long ban. Several temporary bans will eventually result in a permanent ban. We suggest that you read and follow the forum rules, which can be found at (http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=148431).

If you feel that this infraction was given in error, you may explain why you think so in the Dispute Forum (http://sythe.org/forumdisplay.php?f=507) and a moderator or administrator will review your case and come to a final decision.

Thanks,
Sythe.Org Forums

For starters, according to farcast you should only be posting "constructive" things on promotion threads, however I really don't see anybody else posting anything "constructive", unless of course farcasts definition of constructive is different then mine and my dictionary.


Next, the links I posted to the spam forum where completely relevant, because I was expressing how I felt about you by agreeing what other people had posted in the spam forum. I never had any intent to attack you, I was simply expressing how I felt about you and your promotion in the nicest way I could think of.


I'd also like to point out how many times he has flamed and insulted members in the spam forum, then is quick to infract anybody that links to post where he flamed back.


Thanks.

 

[I'm Still Breathing]

what did you do to my post lol?

 

Oh yes, that was a very nice way for you to express it.

It's one thing to post those kind of things in the spam forum. It's another thing to take them from the spam forum and post them where they don't belong to attack me.

Infraction is warranted.

 

[I'm Still Breathing]

Oh yes, that was a very nice way for you to express it.

It's one thing to post those kind of things in the spam forum. It's another thing to take them from the spam forum and post them where they don't belong to attack me.

Infraction is warranted.

I didn't "take them from the spam forum and post them" I linked to them.


I'd also like to point out that obviously you'd think it's warranted since you give it to me.

 

I didn't "take them from the spam forum and post them" I linked to them.


I'd also like to point out that obviously you'd think it's warranted since you give it to me.

It doesn't matter, it's the same concept. If you said something like that outside of the spam forum it would definitely warrant an infraction for flaming. You linking to them from the spam forum to an announcements thread doesn't exempt you from the infraction.

 

[Dalpra]

You're basically indirectly flaming him, even if you weren't, I'd still think it's spam.

Infraction is warranted.

 

[SuF]

I sense Unbanned-type drama. >_<. Obviously borderline, but I would go with warranted.

 

[I'm Still Breathing]

You're basically indirectly flaming him, even if you weren't, I'd still think it's spam.

Infraction is warranted.

lol k it's spam to say gratz to 3 of the promotions, go ahead and infract everybody else on that thread for me please?

I sense Unbanned-type drama. >_<. Obviously borderline, but I would go with warranted.

alright

 

lol k it's spam to say gratz to 3 of the promotions, go ahead and infract everybody else on that thread for me please?

That isn't even what you received an infraction for, don't try to change the subject.

 

[I'm Still Breathing]

That isn't even what you received an infraction for, don't try to change the subject.

Sorry, you must have only read what I said and completely ignored the post I was responding to.

Not to worry though, I've saved you the trouble of having to go back and read it and made a nice little picture clearly highlighting what i was replying to.

 

Sorry, you must have only read what I said and completely ignored the post I was responding to.

Not to worry though, I've saved you the trouble of having to go back and read it and made a nice little picture clearly highlighting what i was replying to.

Sorry since you can't comprehend a simple post let me explain for you, he wasn't even referring to your 3 other posts. Even if you brought up something from the spam forum that wasn't flaming to post about someone it would be considered spam. Regardless of your 3 others.

Thanks.

 

[DropKick Murphys]

Wait, how exactly is posting two links "excessive cursing, insults, and/or derogatory comments towards another user"?

And Dalpra, if saying "gratz" or something similar on promo threads is spam, well, we have a lot of infracting to do.

I think this should be reversed, personally.

 

[OldFinn]

Wait, how exactly is posting two links "excessive cursing, insults, and/or derogatory comments towards another user"?

And Dalpra, if saying "gratz" or something similar on promo threads is spam, well, we have a lot of infracting to do.

I think this should be reversed, personally.

Actually, when two links to flaming posts directed at Farcast are posted, the person who has posted them has simply tried to circumvent getting an infraction for flaming by posting links to flaming rather than saying it themselves. Warranted.