Moon Landing A Hoax?

[Wilson1992]

1. It's really Expensive.
2. There is not much that they can learn from it....so why would they?

Yes it is really expensive but why waste billions on useless wars such as Vietnam or Iraq which have no advantadge for the U.S.A
The moon has great potential. It holds numerous mineral and other useful reserves. The moon has the ability to be the site of future space colonies for further space exploration and there is an economic potential in the space tourism industry.

 

[SwiftSeller]

So how did we get 382 KG of moon rocks?

Who said they were rocks from the moon? Seem like pommus rocks to me.

None of the videos work for me, i'd love to view them.

click the links.

i want pics
and how do we know its from the moon?>

Thank you... Exactly. We dont, thats what this is about.

 

[WinterDreamZ4]

i want pics
and how do we know its from the moon?>

This is how we know...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock

 

[Wilson1992]

This is how we know...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock

The rocks can be ejected from the moon and crashland onto the Earth's surface

Also space probes can gather rocks, you don't have to land on the moon to gather rocks.

 

This is how we know...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock

HOW THE FUCK DO WE KNOW IT IS FROM THE MOON AND THAT SOMEONE DIDN'T PULL IT OUT OF THERE ASS

YOU NEED SOME KIND OF EVIDENCE

and chances are if you provide evidence, there will still be skeptics

 

[SwiftSeller]

This is how we know...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rock

1. thats wikipedia. in actuality, if you were bored enough, you could go on there and type what it says right now for us to believe you... I would much rather a link from NASA or some other .gov website...

The rocks can be ejected from the moon and crashland onto the Earth's surface

Also space probes can gather rocks, you don't have to land on the moon to gather rocks.

2. exactly

 

[madhacker14]

I personally think the moon landing is hoax even without watching the videos. The Americans have claimed they are the only country in the entire world to have landed on the moon BUT they have many holes in their evidence and why would they wait another 50 years since their last landing in 1970 to make another? or did they lack the technology to.

Well for starts, it coasts a massive amount of money,
and there is nothing for us to research upon this rock, that we have not already.
The evidence is clear we have been there,
why does a silly rumor prevent you all from seeing the truth in that?

 

[demonon]

Please review each brief video and then cast your vote. Some supporting evidence would be nice please and thank you.

You can clearly see glints from the wires holding the astronauts up:
http://www.youtube.com/v/wdMvQTNLaUE&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1

If there is no wind on the moon, explain the following two videos:
http://www.youtube.com/v/mJGZte-k4G0&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1
http://www.youtube.com/v/n1UEv2PIzl4&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1

And the lights reflecting off of various things. Keep in mind that only ONE sun could cause ONE light (0:48 and 1:00). Also, at 2:22 there is a small bug that flies in from the left and lands on the moon model:
http://www.youtube.com/v/YeWQ43KGMzY&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x3a3a3a&color2=0x999999&border=1

Truth or hoax? Vote please.

I really think the mythbusters made an episode and busted every myth which claimed the moon landing was a hoax. I will let you know if I find it.

 

[WinterDreamZ4]

I really think the mythbusters made an episode and busted every myth which claimed the moon landing was a hoax. I will let you know if I find it.

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfKItI-cHPM
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOv_zvM-oJQ
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCNV1hiKpLI
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dTATMEJSuQ

 

[SwiftSeller]

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfKItI-cHPM
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOv_zvM-oJQ
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCNV1hiKpLI
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dTATMEJSuQ

So because a gay red head and a dude with a beret said it was true on national television, its automatically true? So if i get on CNN and say aliens exist, then they do? How are they a credible source.

 

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfKItI-cHPM
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOv_zvM-oJQ
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCNV1hiKpLI
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dTATMEJSuQ

hahah you tool, you report the thread starter for insulting people yet he is right that just because a show might test something doesn't mean if you test the same thing that the same results will happen

 

[WinterDreamZ4]

So because a gay red head and a dude with a beret said it was true on national television, its automatically true? So if i get on CNN and say aliens exist, then they do? How are they a credible source.

What about watch the god damn videos and tell why those tests are not right...

hahah you tool, you report the thread starter for insulting people yet he is right that just because a show might test something doesn't mean if you test the same thing that the same results will happen

Show why they are wrong....don't just come here and insult people when they have a point.

 

[SwiftSeller]

What about watch the god damn videos and tell why those tests are not right...



Show why they are wrong....don't just come here and insult people when they have a point.

Dont lose it. Tell how they are right?

 

[xx mdv xx]

I voted possible because there is a lot of evidence that it is a hoax, but then there's stuff that shows that it's not a hoax. Both arguments prove very good points but I can't decide yes or no.

 

[SwiftSeller]

I voted possible because there is a lot of evidence that it is a hoax, but then there's stuff that shows that it's not a hoax. Both arguments prove very good points but I can't decide yes or no.

True. If i could change my vote i would vote possible. While it is common acceptace as yes. many still believe no. possible leaves the vote in the middle.

 

[ownage5life]

1. It's really Expensive.
2. There is not much that they can learn from it....so why would they?

1. They had money. And it would only be really expensive IF THEY REALLY WENT.

2. Space race with the soviet union.

 

[WinterDreamZ4]

1. They had money. And it would only be really expensive IF THEY REALLY WENT.

2. Space race with the soviet union.

It was a answer on a quote...

why would they wait another 50 years since their last landing in 1970 to make another?

 

[Graham]

The evidence shows a fake.

The so called "evidence" doesn't show a fake, it shows some loosely tied together theories, nothing more. I don't particularly think the moon landing was a hoax due to the sheer fact that the film would have been perfectly flawless. If there were errors with the jumping sequences the government and the space industry would have made sure that the evidence which they had produced was impeccable. No one is going to release a video in attempts to prove something with multiple loop holes incorporated in it. The wire proof really doesn't prove much to me, it could have been anything. The jump sequences I explained above. I don't think it was a hoax, but just like any other well thought out theory, this is a fallacy, such as Pearl Harbor being a government setup. But, honestly, who knows? It could have very well been a staged landing, but to my beliefs and knowledge it was not.

 

[Tsumiea]

This is pretty interesting... it seems like there are wires... but ... IM not sure what to say, but again this is interesting...

 

[Graham]

Everyone is using the same "God" format for intelligently discussing this topic. Post your views on why and why not, not "Well tell me how they're right" and "Well tell me how they're wrong". The mythbusters aren't just two people who have odd hair styles and try to provide methodology behind situations. They use proper scientific methods to provide answers to peoples questions. They easily show that the topography of the moon can cause non-parallelism in the shadows which we cast. The videos which were posted a few posts above is actually very interesting and scientifically correct.