The end goal is to stop abuse of collecting vouches the unfair way, this can be done in many different ways all having the same outcome. If you read my original post u should go over the "dividing orders" part again.
Many websites let customers buy in increments just to collect more vouches. There are tons of responses to threads from same users. These are mostly low amounts and multiple vouches given over a short period of time (every couple of hours).
I don't know why everyone keeps thinking this is a bias against "BIG" sites? Any site can do this, even the smallest site. If u can't afford 0.55$ for a vouch then you might aswell close down ur site because imo you're doing something wrong. This is not a bias against big sites. This a standpoint i have that collecting vouches in exchange for money is a bad business practice.
I also don't have anything against COLLECTING VOUCHES. I have something against GAINING MORE THAN U SHOULD from vouches. Vouches are vouches and that's what they should remain. Not a masked tool to get your thread bumped for nickles and dimes. Other websites have this down to a tea. They have a feedback section and u can see the feedback number grow if you're a good seller. People who fare well in the market will have a high feedback score. Those who don't put effort in their business wont have a high feedback score. It's a simple as that. Feedback is used to show how many positive or negative trades a user has performed AND THAT'S IT. Hence it's called FEEDBACK.
I think Sythe is the only forum / platform that vouches / feedback is used for anything else than what it's used for to begin with.... Let me ask u a question, do you think sites would still offer free gold if a vouch wouldn't bump their topic? The answer no, no they wouldn't. So lets call vouches what they really are (atleast on Sythe). They are an unfair way of gaining traffic under the masked name of "vouch" when in reality we should call them bumps. The bump rules is 8 hours on Sythe and if it's that easy to collect free bumps then we migh aswell just change the bump rule to 3 hours or lower. The only benefit this has to Sythe is that i can see sites advertising to sign up on Sythe (in exchange for money) just so they can get bumps. In exchange Sythe gets a new signup but the new user wont contribute to the community anyways. He will vouch the thread given, collect his free gold and never use Sythe again.
This business practice has been used by tons of sites for a long period of time. If i look at my own business practices (yes being one of the top performing sites myself) i have never used a quick and easy (and above all cheap) loophole like this before. If so many people don't see a problem with this then i might as well just start using it aswell and offer 1.5M per vouch which wouldn't cut in my profit margin per sale at all because my profit margin is more than most sites yet i still get traffic the right way.
I don’t see how this is the “unfair” way. The rule is once per 8 hours. If you have performed a trade with someone and they post a vouch on your thread, effectively bumping your thread, then that’s been established as fair game. If you offer an incentive for them to do so, then that’s a win-win for both consumer and supplier. That’s a premier marketing strategy, getting something the company will benefit from that will also benefit benefit the customer at the same time.
And yes, vouches are a form of gauging user trust. Whereas Powerbot has a feedback score on profiles, we have a vouch count and a thread post count that users primarily use to gauge trust. More vouches equates to more posts on a thread which equates to a user being more inclined to click on that thread. Same function, different application.
And just because other sites do it differently doesn’t mean we should adhere to their practices. Sythe is its own site with its own policies. This is effectively the 6th grade argument: “but all my friends have phones so I should have one too!”
Maybe the new user doesn’t ever log onto Sythe again, but maybe he does. Making broad claims that every user this applies to, which is in the thousands, doesn’t hold. I’ll concede even maybe a large majority never return, but some do and this is beneficial. In addition, just because they don’t return doesn’t mean they won’t then mention the site to their friends. The spiderweb effect could very well apply here.
And yes you might as well use this practice because it’s a common sense marketing tactic to drive business. If you’re morally opposed to it, that’s your call as a business owner. People stand for different things. But this is a























































































