that's a common misconception. Research has shown that just because you have gay parents doesn't encourage your children to be gay a whole lot much. It depends on your genetics. Adoption does not involve.Obviously gay parents will raise gay children because straight parents only raise straight children.
Why does everything have to be supported by religion? Not all religions are correct, who knows if any of them are "the true way" and they are all simply made up? Just because of the holy books?Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are always imposed on the entire country. That's why we only have one religion in America.
...I don't know what to say to this. There are some people who consider hanging out with gay people is the best, and those people never turned gay. And how is that hanging around with tall people makes you tall? I'm short for my age, and I hang out with taller people every day. I don't see myself growing to their height.Gay marriage will encourage people to be gay, in the same way that hanging around tall people makes you tall.
...I don't think just because people see lesbians kissing each other on the street won't entice them to go back to their house to "get to know" their dog better.Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage license.
Just because something is not in the norm, does that make it unnatural and abnormal? That sounds pretty offensive....The idea that gay marriage is wrong because gay couples are somehow unnatural is not often stated openly, but this premise influences other arguments and lies behind many people’s negative opinions about homosexuality in general. For most people, heterosexual relationships are the norm, both in society and in nature. Homosexual relationships are thus abnormal and unnatural; therefore, they shouldn’t be validated by the state nor recognized as a form of marriage.
Very often the argument that homosexual relationships are “unnatural†is meant to describe the fact that they do not and cannot lead to the creation of children, which is supposed to be the “natural†consequence of such intimate relationships, especially marriage. This argument also isn’t effective, but the relationship between marriage and raising children is addressed in more detail elsewhere.
Ultimately, the “homosexuality is unnatural†argument fails to support the case against same-sex marriage because there is no clear and convincing content to the concept of “unnatural†in the first place. Everything that is claimed to be “unnatural’ is either arguably very natural, arguably irrelevant to what the laws should be, or is simply immaterial to what should be treated as moral and immoral. It's no coincidence that what is "unnatural" also happens to be condemned by the speaker's religious or cultural traditions. Just because some trait or activity isn’t the norm among humans doesn’t make it “unnatural†and therefore wrong.
Wait, now you're backing it up..? Wha..?



