Pro Life..are you really?
- Thread starter TJ
- Start date
A
Alt 14
Guest
Animals are property. Pro-life generally refers to giving unborn (human) babies the chance to live. Animals don't have rights. The owner does whatever the fuck he/she wants to with them.
/thread
/thread
A
Alt 14
Guest
Humans have natural rights. Animals don't.
You are correct when you say that I am property until I'm 18 in the sense that I must obey to age of consent laws, but I still have rights. The only reason for age of consent laws is to ensure that the child can fully understand the decisions being made. Killing a 4 year old isn't protecting their rights.
All humans have the right to life, liberty and property. Animals have the right to... nothing. You still have to respect property laws, though. If you kill someone's pet dog, you destroyed property.
You are correct when you say that I am property until I'm 18 in the sense that I must obey to age of consent laws, but I still have rights. The only reason for age of consent laws is to ensure that the child can fully understand the decisions being made. Killing a 4 year old isn't protecting their rights.
All humans have the right to life, liberty and property. Animals have the right to... nothing. You still have to respect property laws, though. If you kill someone's pet dog, you destroyed property.
A
Alt 14
Guest
...
Are you kidding me? Well yeah, lets give rights to plants too. They're living. And bacteria I guess. Viruses should also have rights because they're almost living things.
Animals are property. You own your dog. You can't own a human anymore and when you could they had no rights. Property doesn't have a right to anything. Why should someone tell you not to smash your phone on the ground? It's your phone. Do what you want, I don't care. Same thing with animals.
Again, /thread.
Are you kidding me? Well yeah, lets give rights to plants too. They're living. And bacteria I guess. Viruses should also have rights because they're almost living things.
Animals are property. You own your dog. You can't own a human anymore and when you could they had no rights. Property doesn't have a right to anything. Why should someone tell you not to smash your phone on the ground? It's your phone. Do what you want, I don't care. Same thing with animals.
Again, /thread.
A
Alt 14
Guest
No, that's not what I'm saying. You can't just go around destroying things that don't belong to you. However, why should the government be able to tell you what you can do and what you can't do with YOUR PROPERTY? It's no one's business what you do with things that belong to you.
I wouldn't kill my dogs because I like them. If you killed my dogs, that's a crime. BUT if you kill your dogs, for whatever reason, you have the right to do that. Why should anyone stop you?
I wouldn't kill my dogs because I like them. If you killed my dogs, that's a crime. BUT if you kill your dogs, for whatever reason, you have the right to do that. Why should anyone stop you?
C
Cruel__Machine
Guest
Most pro-life people are religious people who believe in a creator that gave them dominion over animals. So no, this does not include animals.
all of this argument is gay. i can kill a person or a cow if i want to.
if half of you bastards were pro-life you would'nt throw unborn children at your computer screen.
if half of you bastards were pro-life you would'nt throw unborn children at your computer screen.
TJ
Hero
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 42
- Messages
- 5,922
You can kill a person or a cow if you want. The only difference between the both, is that killing a person gets you charged with murder.
Any im not pro-life since i do believe whatever a person wants to do with there body then go ahead and let them
A
Alt 14
Guest
Are you fucking kidding? Why are animals property? Are you even reading what you're suggesting? Animals do not posses higher level thinking skills. They have been domesticated for thousands of years. We are the supreme species.
This is complete idiocy. END THREAD. You have no valid points. Stop trying.
P.S. No, the only difference between killing a human and killing a cow is that a human has rights and you took the life of a HUMAN. A cow was bred for property. If you honestly can't tell the difference between killing a cow for food and shooting a man in the face you have issues.
This is complete idiocy. END THREAD. You have no valid points. Stop trying.
P.S. No, the only difference between killing a human and killing a cow is that a human has rights and you took the life of a HUMAN. A cow was bred for property. If you honestly can't tell the difference between killing a cow for food and shooting a man in the face you have issues.
TJ
Hero
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 42
- Messages
- 5,922
But why the hell should we control everything. So what we have higher thinking patterns. But yet if you believe in god, god is the supreme being in your life, making in which that he controls everything. In fact, according to him, he did create everything in his image, therefore you are killing him.
A
Alt 14
Guest
I don't believe in a god but that was such a flawed argument I'll defend it anyway.
First of all, god didn't create everything in his image. He created MAN in his image. Read genesis. Not dogs, not cows, man. Lets just pretend you weren't completely wrong from the get-go.
What you're saying is that if you kill something made in the image of something else, you are in fact also killing the model? What is this, voodoo? Your children are in the image of you and your women, correct? If I blast the brains out of your daughter with a shot gun, how is that killing you?
Why SHOULD we control everything? Because nothing else is. I am damn sure if a cow was capable of competing with human technology we would expect its rights - but it can't. You have already said that you have no religion so I am going to assume you trust science. Would you not agree that the strongest of a species outlives and out-fucks the weaker of the species? Let's take this to a social level. Those with the most charisma and brains become the leaders of nations. Since you're talking about animals getting the same rights as humans, they can be compared to us. You can quickly see they are inferior and have contributed (almost) nothing to society. That's why we own shit.
First of all, god didn't create everything in his image. He created MAN in his image. Read genesis. Not dogs, not cows, man. Lets just pretend you weren't completely wrong from the get-go.
What you're saying is that if you kill something made in the image of something else, you are in fact also killing the model? What is this, voodoo? Your children are in the image of you and your women, correct? If I blast the brains out of your daughter with a shot gun, how is that killing you?
Why SHOULD we control everything? Because nothing else is. I am damn sure if a cow was capable of competing with human technology we would expect its rights - but it can't. You have already said that you have no religion so I am going to assume you trust science. Would you not agree that the strongest of a species outlives and out-fucks the weaker of the species? Let's take this to a social level. Those with the most charisma and brains become the leaders of nations. Since you're talking about animals getting the same rights as humans, they can be compared to us. You can quickly see they are inferior and have contributed (almost) nothing to society. That's why we own shit.