I was watching television and was watching a recount on a court case. This man was found guilty of attempted murder on his wife and was given a bail of 1 million dollars. Any average person would not be able to afford this however he was very wealthy and easily paid this. Then later he paid a very large amount of money to hire lawyers to prove his innocence, and he was actually found not guilty.
Now any average-wealthy person would not be able to afford any of this. And if this circumstance was put onto an average-wealthy person they would not be able to afford the bail or the lawyers and would go down as a convicted murder.
My discussion for this is that this individual was given justice simply because he could afford it, not because of the justice system. This raises the discussion are rich people served justice more so then an average-wealthy person.
Now any average-wealthy person would not be able to afford any of this. And if this circumstance was put onto an average-wealthy person they would not be able to afford the bail or the lawyers and would go down as a convicted murder.
My discussion for this is that this individual was given justice simply because he could afford it, not because of the justice system. This raises the discussion are rich people served justice more so then an average-wealthy person.




