- Joined
- Aug 7, 2016
- Sythe Gold
- 232
- Messages
- 1,094
Guys, I don't play ranked. I don't even consider myself a huge LoL player to be honest. But I'm enjoying the game a bit more than I used to.
Regardless, you guys are underestimating what the element of surprise can do for you whether of if you're laning or not, just because YOU don't know of a good play style, doesn't mean someone else can't find one.
Try again though, how's this for win-loss example?
Still completely irrelevant in my opinion. Normals means absolutely jack for a champion like Evelynn. In normals, it should always be game over if you get ahead since people couldn't care less about victory. Evelynn is the easiest champion to get ahead on, especially because of her roam potential.
This would never work competitively. She's god awful against competitive mid lane picks. Additionally, ranked brings much more to the table than normals, including heightened map awareness. People actually care about roams in ranked; they will play especially carefully. If you're playing eve mid, you can guarantee that the other team is going to pay close attention to when you're missing.
Additionally, people actually give a lot of damn about victory. The other team is going to drag out the game as long as possible and you'll be next to useless in late game team fights; you have no gapclosers. I guarantee you won your longer games because the other team just couldn't bother to group up and play carefully, and you just got free picks over and over. If I watched your replays, I would probably witness your opponents being absolute retards.
And your longest game was lost even though you have 25 kills. A loss after snowballing speaks much more than a win after snowballing.
To close out, anything works in normals. Just because you snowballed against other casual players doesn't testify to how good Eve mid is. I promise you we are not 'underestimating the power of surprise'; you are overestimating it. If you can consistently climb with it in ranked then you'll have a better argument.
Last edited:





























































