Click macros/auto hot-keys

[Spyder69]

I'm looking for something that performs like this program Auto Clicker

Are there better options?

The conundrum i'm facing is that i'm wanting to train some tedious tasks that can be performed without the interference of ticks, so i'm looking to complete these in-game tasks ASAP.

Does something like this only work in a single window? I'm a bit confused as to how these work exactly with respects to the client itself. I've seen some where the mouse itself moves, and others where the mouse remains stationary but clicks are seen on items in the inventory. I'm not sure if this is because of the speed they've set, or due to other factors. Also, on a botting thread some posters were raising questions regarding the macros accuracy due to the Jagex client itself. Am I worrying about something entirely irrelevant?

I'm not really a coding genius (shit I don't know the first thing about coding anyways), so some of the feedback people have given certain programs makes me believe that some of these either work well, or don't work at all.


Lastly, for those that have experience, have you ever experienced bans using these? I don't plan on using them for extended periods of time whatsoever, just for momentary tedious tasks that I may need to do every once in a while. However, i'm still skeptical as to whether or not using this would instantly send up red flags.

Thank you.

e: Also, if there's already a thread about this that someone is aware of please let me know and i'll request this be locked.

 

Doing this is a very bad idea, it would form an easily detectable pattern. Even if you were to do it Runescape has a bunch of things implemented to combat auto clickers so it wouldn't work for more than 10 - 15 minutes.

 

[Felix]

Doing this is a very bad idea, it would form an easily detectable pattern. Even if you were to do it Runescape has a bunch of things implemented to combat auto clickers so it wouldn't work for more than 10 - 15 minutes.

yeah but the auto click detection isn't all that from my experience, if you just set the auto clicker from different ranges and at different coordinates on your screen, they won't be able to pick much of a pattern

 

yeah but the auto click detection isn't all that from my experience, if you just set the auto clicker from different ranges and at different coordinates on your screen, they won't be able to pick much of a pattern

Whether they ban you for it immediately or not, they can certainly detect it. The reason people probably notice less bans is because they don't run them for 24 hours a day.

 

[SmokeHut]

Whether they ban you for it immediately or not, they can certainly detect it. The reason people probably notice less bans is because they don't run them for 24 hours a day.

If say; person sets an auto-clicker for say; Camelot teleporting. Said person uses a random co-ordinate pattern with random time intervals, and is babysitting so can stop the auto-clicking when they leave the PC to eat or other intervals, they do not click when they're not at the PC.

I cannot see how a detection system could possibly detect any pattern in it.

So long as there were mouse curves to new locations, random pixel co-ordinate clicking and random time intervals with human play time.

It would literally be impossible to detect imo.

 

If say; person sets an auto-clicker for say; Camelot teleporting. Said person uses a random co-ordinate pattern with random time intervals, and is babysitting so can stop the auto-clicking when they leave the PC to eat or other intervals, they do not click when they're not at the PC.

I cannot see how a detection system could possibly detect any pattern in it.

So long as there were mouse curves to new locations, random pixel co-ordinate clicking and random time intervals with human play time.

It would literally be impossible to detect imo.

First of all humans aren't random.
Even when humans play they form a pattern, just like an auto clicker would. The auto clicker pattern however would stand out from the human patterns and result in a ban.

 

[f0rza]

botted fletch 1-85, that ban rate i think 10x lower than botting, but never know

 

[DarkSpark]

You can easily code anti-ban techniques into an auto clicker... set click intervals with a random variance of upto a second. Set the click location with variable of upto 20-30 pixels. monitor the clicker and chat etc. Any program can work depending on how you set it up and what sort of "botting regime" you use.

personally my preferred method is to run a program such as rsbot ONLY while i am on the computer doing other stuff. I have it on my third screen so i can keep an eye on it and aim to only let it run unsupervised for 30 minutes tops.

 

[East Chicken]

I use xdotool on a linux vm and I've never been banned
Though things you can do are pretty limited
I might make a more detailed guide if people want it

 

[SmokeHut]

First of all humans aren't random.
Even when humans play they form a pattern, just like an auto clicker would. The auto clicker pattern however would stand out from the human patterns and result in a ban.

You're not thinking it through, it would be consistently random. Like a human would also be.

I could lift my mouse and click every 1-2 seconds so that for 1,000 teles the mouse position didn't move alone the random intervals i.e inconsistent intervals would be enough to not receive a ban. They don't ban on inconclusive data. Using random patterns would not provide them with conclusive data.

A person autoclicking every 1.000 seconds for 10,000 clicks without a mouse position and continuing to click after having no teleports left would provide them with conclusive data that said actions aren't human.

 

You're not thinking it through, it would be consistently random. Like a human would also be.

I could lift my mouse and click every 1-2 seconds so that for 1,000 teles the mouse position didn't move alone the random intervals i.e inconsistent intervals would be enough to not receive a ban. They don't ban on inconclusive data. Using random patterns would not provide them with conclusive data.

A person autoclicking every 1.000 seconds for 10,000 clicks without a mouse position and continuing to click after having no teleports left would provide them with conclusive data that said actions aren't human.

You're the one not thinking it through, real people don't play so consistently either, they move their mouse off screen, go to do other things. Continuing to click in the same position is not how they go about detection; Jagex have endless data of the heuristics of people using autoclickers that they can match to your heuristics and ban you.

 

[SmokeHut]

You're the one not thinking it through, real people don't play so consistently either, they move their mouse off screen, go to do other things. Continuing to click in the same position is not how they go about detection; Jagex have endless data of the heuristics of people using autoclickers that they can match to your heuristics and ban you.

I'm not trying to put it in a position of person teleports 10,000 times without a click ranging outside of the region of 1-2 seconds.

I said human like play - that would involve moving the mouse off screen as you'd be babysitting it.

I've literally just achieved 94 magic this way, using AHK. My script alchs and stuns consistently whilst I hold the hotkey. I'm watching Youtube etc whilst I do it so I'm taking my mouse off screen within at least every five minutes.

I'm literally doing the exact same thing I'd be doing whether I was clicking it myself or not.

The days are definitely gone of leaving something run unattended for x period of time. However, you can take the monotonous steps out of achieving the same goal.

If I do receive a ban, I'll be sure to congratulate you. However, I cannot see how it's possible.

 

I'm not trying to put it in a position of person teleports 10,000 times without a click ranging outside of the region of 1-2 seconds.

I said human like play - that would involve moving the mouse off screen as you'd be babysitting it.

I've literally just achieved 94 magic this way, using AHK. My script alchs and stuns consistently whilst I hold the hotkey. I'm watching Youtube etc whilst I do it so I'm taking my mouse off screen within at least every five minutes.

I'm literally doing the exact same thing I'd be doing whether I was clicking it myself or not.

The days are definitely gone of leaving something run unattended for x period of time. However, you can take the monotonous steps out of achieving the same goal.

If I do receive a ban, I'll be sure to congratulate you. However, I cannot see how it's possible.

If you do this or bot sooner or later you will receive a ban, for AHK it would probably be macro minor however.

 

[SmokeHut]

If you do this or bot sooner or later you will receive a ban, for AHK it would probably be macro minor however.

Can you explain your logic behind it?

I've explained that;

• I'm actively holding a hotkey to loop the script.
• I'm actively anti-banning myself with human like behavior because I'm physically moving the mouse to watch a new video, talk in cc or whatever.
• I'm using randomized timers between time frames that anyone who's focused on what they're doing in the game would essentially be keeping between.
• There's logarithmic curves on the mouse movements instead of shortest path.
• Randomized mouse speeds fairly consistent with my normal mouse speed.

From that description, what possible software could detect inhuman like behavior?

Let's take their knowns -

Client
mouse speed
click (hold) length
a mouse movement heatmap
detection for inhuman mouse movements - i.e straight lines at high speed

I'd say I've covered them areas to play like a human would in that circumstance.

You can't just project - if you macro anything you will be detected for it; it just isn't true.