- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Sythe Gold
- 1,828
- Messages
- 8,853
I'm arguing that they should be bannedI didn't say anything about bans.
You're saying they're not
Kind of goes without saying
But okay
I'm arguing that they should be bannedI didn't say anything about bans.
I asked a question and you went on a irreverent rant it looks like. Why should they pay people back?I'm arguing that they should be banned
You're saying they're not
Kind of goes without saying
But okay
Because it's a market based forum and they shouldn't be allowed back to it if they don't pay anything back? Pretty simpleI asked a question and you went on a irreverent rant it looks like. Why should they pay people back?
That's not really an argument. Why does being a market based forum matter?Because it's a market based forum and they shouldn't be allowed back to it if they don't pay anything back? Pretty simple
Because scamming on a market based forum literally goes against the entire nature of the website, so why do you think it's acceptable to allow people back that have literally broken the one rule that should matter the most and does matter the most on literally every other market website/forum/entity there is?That's not really an argument. Why does being a market based forum matter?
Because scamming on a market based forum literally goes against the entire nature of the website, so why do you think it's acceptable to allow people back that have literally broken the one rule that should matter the most and does matter the most on literally every other market website/forum/entity there is?
Can you post something that's not just bullshit aimed at sucking Big Rich's dick for mod or are we wasting our time here?
Well you've been dickriding the entire idea of DNT which is unbanning them, and you're now arguing that they shouldn't have to pay anything back? So essentially you're saying they don't deserve to be punished? Please go ahead and say it's just like a real legal system again because we both know it isn't. Any real life repercussions for stealing an amount of money someone has stolen on here would likely if not definitely be greater and have a larger effect on someone's life than being banned from here so saying that banning someone from here is their "punishment" for scamming when you're just going to unban them anyways and they get to keep the money is a joke.Banning them is their punishment. Why do you want to punish them twice? How is paying them back related to scamming in any way?
"mod plz"tbh i started trolling like 4 or 5 posts ago because i couldn't be bothered
People already think it's some sort of voluntary rankI'd say being dnt is worse than being banned tbh as people will know not to trade with them unless its like a drama ban or something
I mean I'm not a mod now or else I would have just started ignoring you because you just can't be reasoned with and you keep making assumptions about what I'm saying and you won't do anything but complain about DNT. It's like you don't care that you will get nothing done like this and you could have done a lot after having a nice conversation with me but you didn't want to so meh fuck it"mod plz"
People already think it's some sort of voluntary rank
I mean I'm not a mod now or else I would have just started ignoring you because you just can't be reasoned with and you keep making assumptions about what I'm saying and you won't do anything but complain about DNT.
Elaborate on what the fuck you think could have been doneI mean I'm not a mod now or else I would have just started ignoring you because you just can't be reasoned with and you keep making assumptions about what I'm saying and you won't do anything but complain about DNT. It's like you don't care that you will get nothing done like this and you could have done a lot after having a nice conversation with me but you didn't want to so meh fuck it
Not when it looks like something that could easily be requested and it has actually been requested by users who weren't banned in the first placeThat's their stupidity then, don't you think?
Elaborate on what the fuck you think could have been done
Not when it looks like something that could easily be requested and it has actually been requested by users who weren't banned in the first place
Not even slightly true and I think you're far overestimating the effect that a DNT tag has. Once it's removed it's very unlikely anyone trading with them is going to know they had it. As for them having it currently it doesn't really matter because they already got a free ride back without paying back a dime in exchange for a little bit of flaming from other community members telling them to pay back which they won't do anyways, sounds a lot easier than just being banned.My point is most banned users are usually forgotten and come back like nothing happened whereas if people with DNT stayed around it would be pretty easy to find out why they got DNT in the first place. If you still don't know what I mean let me know and i'll try to explain it further.
Not really. you can request a DNT. look at admires.. and his indirect attemptsThat's their stupidity then, don't you think?
Scamming is theft. Not paying back a loan is not theft and it is illegal to be put in prison for failing to pay back a loan. Courts can force you to pay but they can not throw you in jail. It's absolutely stupid to treat failing to pay back a loan the same as scammer because it by definition it is not. When you lend money you are taking a risk that you will not get your money back and you should charge a high interest rate if you do not believe you will get your money back. It's that simple.
I'm not siding with idiots. I'm siding with common sense. Banning someone because they can't afford to pay back a loan is one of the most retarded things I've ever heard. It's a guaranteed way to make sure you never see a cent of that money back and it's simply wrong.

