Whoever banned me needs to step down

[Unregistered Zooes]

Profile: http://www.sythe.org/members/362247-zeus.html

Whoever banned me should literally resign and go back to elementary school. You fail as a moderator and are incompetent at your job. You obviously cannot comprehension the same basic rules that you are suppose to be enforcing.

I got banned for "defacing a user's picture". I highly suggest you take a dictionary and look up what the word 'defacing' means. Oh wait... I forgot. You don't even need to do that because its right there alongside the defacing rule.

Now please tell me how I was defacing someone's picture in this post: http://www.sythe.org/13618784-post1173.html , when the original was posted by the user himself here http://www.sythe.org/13299831-post544.html

#factsstraight

 

[Josh0is0here]

First off, I strongly recommend that you tone down the dramatic language. You are currently making this thread trying to get us to agree that the ban was misguided however attacking staff by name calling is a very good way of extending your current ban. You might not be aware of this but there is a Zero Tolerance Rule on sythe towards staff members.

Also, you might not know but we don't get paid for the time we put into this site. We do it so that the community can be a better place. In this case you clearly haven't learned how to be respectful of other user's property. It clearly states you must have the users consent. Which you didn't therefore the week ban stays.

The moderator who banned you was just following the rules. I went back and reviewed the ban. And you deserved it because you didn't have the users consent. But for the record staff isn't punishing you for the name calling however we ask that you please refrain from it in the future even if you are angry. Thanks, and see you in a week

 

[Josh0is0here]

Given what I said previous, I'd like to change my stance given this:

There's an unwritten element of intent in the rule;

If the disclosure is a joke (in poor taste) we normally just remove it and keep an eye on the user who posted it. It is still against the rules but we don't like banning people unless some actual harm is done.

If, on the other hand, it is done in malice OR the victim files a scam report and requests the full punishment be applied then the one month ban is used.

Abarta probably bitched for the ban for the lulz, the intent wasn't criminal.

Other cases of him claiming defacement:

http://www.sythe.org/dispute-forum-archive/1721466-dave-banned-personal-pictures.html

Precedent set was for an unban for previous user. Therefore, I support the same for this user.

 

[Lean]

Given what I said previous, I'd like to change my stance given this:



Abarta probably bitched for the ban for the lulz, the intent wasn't criminal.

Other cases of him claiming defacement:

http://www.sythe.org/dispute-forum-archive/1721466-dave-banned-personal-pictures.html

Precedent set was for an unban for previous user. Therefore, I support the same for this user.

The intent was to cause emotional harm to the user "Abarta", he can serve out his ban.

 

[Josh0is0here]

That was a joke in the spam forum...(oh course I know the real person behind the bans). I made a judgement call based upon how previous reports from Abarta on the same issue were handled. <_<

 

[Lean]

That was a joke in the spam forum...I read the ban reason, I read the report and I made a judgement call based upon how previous reports from Abarta on the same issue were handled. <_<

It was the sandbox.

 

[Josh0is0here]

http://www.sythe.org/spam-forum/1725586-request-restitution.html. I never posted in sandbox, but I do stand behind the idea that he should get unbanned but whatever let have a global jump in and lay the law down.

 

[Lean]

http://www.sythe.org/spam-forum/1725586-request-restitution.html. I never posted in sandbox, but I do stand behind the idea that he should get unbanned but whatever let have a global jump in and lay the law down.

I don't even know what you're talking about. This ban is over this post that was made within the sandbox http://www.sythe.org/13618784-post1173.html which still hasn't been deleted for some reason, even though it contains a users personal photograph that has been altered without their consent.

 

[Josh0is0here]

I don't even know what you're talking about. This ban is over this post that was made within the sandbox http://www.sythe.org/13618784-post1173.html which still hasn't been deleted for some reason, even though it contains a users personal photograph that has been altered without their consent.

I think we are getting confused, I meant the joke about Richard doing the banning was purely a poor taste joke by me in the spam forum. And I'm sorry for that, I've no idea why the post is still there you may remove it. And I do understand the incident occurred in the sandbox.

 

I am the one who placed the ban. You edited the photo of said user to be used for a purpose different than what was originally intended. That is my reasoning but I'll allow another staff member to make the decision.