Classic Example

<moved>

 

I fail to understand your point...

OK, members can't speak their minds, but how does that bring in scammers?

Let's try and make a valid argument.

 

I dont understand what you are trying to say either.

That mods ban people unfairly?

Or that sythe is run by teenagers?

 

If you are going to quote me, as least post all of it.

You missed the part where I defended my friends and explained why he was an idiot.

Good job.

 

yeah i edited it because it was to long, thus the reason you can see where i edited it, and still .... people get banned for that anyways? so what thats your point...

 

Not the point Shin you insulted him, thats what he posted, which is all the evidence he needed to support his case.

 

How about you trust the mods, God know the need proof for everything. Moreover 3 admins and like 5mods where all talking at the same time about this ok. They were working hard on this topic, and did you ever read how dumb he sound, I though i had right to sell cheap... Common sense these days.

 

Controlled anger though, that's what he's posting, that just because of one stupid dispute Shin has the right to do what someone was infracted for.

 

I gave Shin permission to post that, because Jensen just wasn't getting it.

And I fail to see how that makes more scammers come.

 

So Shin gets permission but a regular member gets infracted?

 

I'm sorry?

 

Anyone who insulted Jensen was not infracted in that thread.

 

Listen Shin as I've told you on msn your a cool guy I just think it's a bit unfair to the person infracted.

EDIT: Well then I'm ready to, he's an idiot but I still wouldn't cuss him out.

 

Note the words in that tread, Shin gave me an infraction for something eles, they expire and it nothing to worry about. However you lack of respect for an exstaff in bad, He ask to be demoted not forced. Moreover, Look how well shin repsone was

 

Repsected members > normal members. Thats true almost everywhere. Is it fair? Not really, but oh well, life isn't fair.

Deal with it.

And the stuff about this making more scammers come makes no sense...

 

Correct, because you "big admin" agreed that, what Jensen did was wrong, correct? im not disputing that... im just saying just because STEPH thought he was guilty and a few staff... then its ok to publicly shame him out?? yet if a member did this to a normal member then they would be infractioned etc.. leading to being banned

So i still stand by my point there is double standards...