Whole of Staff Feedback

It's the same as if Bogla, Arcus or anyone with a high rep was to be reported, a DNT wasn't warranted, T1N0 has been contacting me on Skype whenever I've needed him to and I didn't feel the need for a DNT, a DNT is for someone who is at a risk of scam-quitting. 1 account was recovered, which t1n0 is clearly trying to solve.

If he had multiple reports on him; sure.
If I was to sell an account and the person was just to claim "Oh she recovered it" with no real evidence, I wouldn't expect a DNT on someone such as myself especially with no other reports and clear indication that I was trying to help him.

DNT isn't one set rule, the staff dealing with the report sees what is fit, I didn't think a DNT was necessary on T1N0 because of his actions/previous trust in the community.

For all we know this guy could of botted on his own account and is now claiming ignorance because he wants to quit League and is trying to shift t1n0 for 150 euros. Each case has it's own scenario and to lump someone with a mass amount of trust to someone who joined a month ago just isn't fair.

 

i was DNT for over a week when actively trying to resolve it from the get-go. The report was lacking alot of evidence which delayed the whole process to having it resolved.

There was no other reports on me during that time either - i do agree there is to an extent a degree of double standards on sythe when it comes to disputes.

 

Didnt feel like posting this before, but staff has been ignoring the following rules on a continious basis:

• Anyone found cheating in/manipulating competitions or other such events will be punished:
  • 1st Offense - One month competition ban
  • 2nd Offense - Two month competition ban
  • 3rd Offense - Perm Ban from competitions
  All of these will include an automatic disqualification from the competition and the user will be given the "BANNED FROM COMPETITIONS" user title

 

Haha found this post from mistake and you are here licking tinos ass?

Mind telling me this "could of botted on his own account and is now claiming ignorance because he wants to quit League "
The account is not banned its pretty obvious. Its recorveryed and its prooffed couple times on the thread.
"
1 account was recovered, which t1n0 is clearly trying to solve. " Tino has done nothing to solve this

 

This was exactly the kind of case I was thinking about. T1n0 should have got a DNT from the start just as you did even if he was 'actively resolving it' otherwise that is unfair on you.

The fact that it is a lol account and not an rs account shouldn't change it either.

 

No hes licking tinos ass for sure.

Tino were not twced by chloe for sure.
Mind telling me someone why am i twced now.
Also would love to another mod take a look of the thread instead of chloe as hes not neutral in this case for sure.

 

This is what happens when the mod cant handle dispute with being neutral for both parties. Have ignored all my messages and private messages.

 

Mods will all handle situations in a different way, I gave @Dieze a DNT at the time due to a trusted sythe member with a high rep telling me that he was certain dieze scammed + a report popping up shortly after. I tried working with dieze to solve the report and it took a while because it was fairly complicated + I had to get multiple opinions on it.

Chloe felt like the DNT wasn't needed at the time like she said in that post.

 

So if one of those members said they're fairly certain bogla or arcus had scammed, and need to refund - they'd get a DNT?

The point SJ was making was the rules/DNT rank are being used differently depending who the report is based on - as opposed to the evidence provided.

 

If there was a report and it did look suspicious then yes i would have but that's just me. Like i said different staff handle it differently. With big sites i feel as if it is more relaxed though and we often wait for their reply before DNTing but that's mainly due to the reputation they have and i guess the amount they were accused of scamming.

I see your point about who the report is based on but at the moment we DNT if we feels it's necessary and we try to resolve reports as quick as we can but sometimes more complicated ones can take a while as you know.

 

I don't think its necessarily bias based on who is being accused, rather inconsistencies throughout the staff team when it comes to handling cases like these. Hell, @Astro was given a DNT because the other party didn't get their BTC like an hour after he sent it (I know there was more to that case, I'm just saying the first DNT he had right after the thread was posted).

 

I agree with what you're saying, and I think you made the right move, one that I have done or suggested people do when I spent time on the staff team. I wasn't calling it a bad decision, rather an example of how a different situation played out, where a trusted member did quickly receive a DNT. Earlier in the thread some people were claiming that tino's 'trusted' status was keeping him from being DNT'd. Variance just comes with the nature of these cases, and the fact that there is no "one size fits all" method to handling scam reports. DNT is a very flexible rank and is given out for a variety of reasons, it's really difficult to act consistently across the board.

 

Stop giving people DNT's until they're proven guilty especially if they're extremely trustworthy users that have proven themselves, it's really annoying to see.

 

Ok take out the very trustworthy part and my statement still stands, innocent until proven guilty, once provably guilty feel free to DNT someone.

 

If there needs to to be more insight then the report is not complete and shouldn't result in the person who isn't provably guilty to be DNT'd unless you see like 3 reports on one person.

 

no i'm stating in general you're the only person linking reports.