Who or what defines god?

You possess the burden of proof(cite your source / derive some model of rational functionality that is superior to opposing proposed theories within the discussion), as well as numerous fallacies in the composition of your argument.

Also, there are no mathematical impossibilities where contingencies, which may/may not play by uncertain quantum mechanisms, exist.

 

According to our current models, existence itself is based on things that should not exists at all. Existence is more like probabilities being right where they need to be at the right time. Highly organized. Sorry if this sounds strange I am using a translator.

Let's see... How do we define existence? How can one prove anything exists including ourselves? In order to understand the big picture we must understand the small things even the small insignificant things that we don't think matter. Question the things we Take for granted and then we began to see that everything in this life is completely strange and pretty much off the grid. We call this the gray area because no one seems to want to talk about. It. Almost as if we are afraid to.

Sorry this is my Good morning post heh

 

Are you slow or something? I'm not asking you to explain simple exponents, I'm asking you -- for the third time now -- to cite your fucking sources. Where did you specifically get the information on the probability of a cell's existence? First you said it was 10^3377, now it's 10^50+1? Not to mention that is certainly not a mathematical impossibility, considering we have already created notation for said number (re: 1.e+51). Maybe you keep sidestepping the question because you're talking out of your ass, I don't know.

 

Stop with the insults. When I get to my computer I'll hand walk you threw law of probability and a little bit of thermodynamics. I have to remind myself that the majority of people are not .bright when it comes to simple mathematics.

The 10^50+1 is a small number I used as a base. The 10^33K +1 is the actual number I used as a probability of a cell existence. My apologies for not knowing English well and Also not carrying my laptop everywhere I go. I'll be back soon to post the simple maths that can be easily Google, again not that difficult.

 

You ask someone to stop insulting you, then you immediately insult them with your demeaning tone. This is why people do not talk about religion. Disagree in peace.

 

This seems like it's the exact opposite of inherent truths relating to Special Relativity. It seems that everything is with an essential sameness, and it's with that thought that we even come to any understanding of the things around/of us. In order to understand the small things, we must understand the big things.

A hierarchy has had the most effectiveness as a model for things. The child comes from the mother. The flower comes from the seed. These things aren't the opposite for a reason; if we start from flower, we'd never understand the seed. By virtue of our existential ignorance, we can say that because we are, greater things are; in the same way, we can say that because the flower is, the seed is. That is observation, though, not understanding.

Also, the ad hominem is unproductive and annoying. If you continue with insults then you might as well not even discuss dude

 

Great points there. I definitely agree with the created and creator point. It's insanely hard to try to picture something greater than us, because for the majority, we have only seen us. For example, try imagining infinity. Our human minds can't grasp something infinite, because we are finite. We have an end, however God would not have an end. We also had a start, where as God would not have had a start, he would of always been there. Therefore, trying to discuss something that we can't even grasp would mean we are making judgments or assertions that we don't even fully understand, and most likely never will.