Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by malakadang, Sep 23, 2011.

Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.
  1. Unread #1 - Sep 23, 2011 at 3:53 AM
  2. malakadang
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    5,679
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    900
    Discord Unique ID:
    220842789083152384
    Discord Username:
    malakadang#3473
    Two Factor Authentication User Easter 2013 Doge Community Participant

    malakadang Hero
    malakadang Donor Retired Global Moderator

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Very recently, some research that has not yet been published, but provides an inkling towards the fact that something can travel faster than the speed of light has been discovered.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-0923-speed-of-light-20110923,0,497738.story

    If you think this is bogus, google for yourself. It's a very recent discovery that, though has not yet been published nor confirmed may provide inordinately useful and challenging information for particle physicists to reconcile, and conjure up a new theory, and or add an addendum to the old Special Relativity.
     
  3. Unread #2 - Sep 23, 2011 at 4:09 AM
  4. SexayMistahBee
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Posts:
    2,410
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    27
    Discord Username:
    SexayMistahBee

    SexayMistahBee Sexiest Bee On Earth
    $50 USD Donor New

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    That's quiet a find :/
    Now to utilize it in time traveling... Aye?
     
  5. Unread #3 - Sep 23, 2011 at 5:25 AM
  6. Determinate
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Posts:
    10,394
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Determinate Legend
    Banned

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    I still don't see how you could be your own grandmother...

    Seems like a pretty stupid metaphor if you ask me.
     
  7. Unread #4 - Sep 23, 2011 at 6:11 AM
  8. x339
    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Posts:
    3,223
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    x339 Grand Master
    Do Not Trade

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Interesting, well that would completely dash all theories of "time travel" because if those particles are travelling faster than the speed of light, then that means time travel doesn't work that way.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Sep 23, 2011 at 8:06 AM
  10. Jei jei KK
    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Posts:
    224
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Jei jei KK Active Member

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    ???

    Anyways, when they rule out possible errors and oversights and there's more supporting studies it'll be awesome, at least because of the fantasies offered by the possibilities. Until then, don't bet on time traveling to the past to save your first love from a tragic accident.
     
  11. Unread #6 - Sep 23, 2011 at 10:37 AM
  12. Honeo
    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2005
    Posts:
    496
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Honeo Forum Addict

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Yes, this aids the theory of time travel, but it's still a far fetched idea. Sure, they got subatomic particles to travel at the speed of light, now get every particle in the human body to do it... Impossible.

    Still an incredible discovery non the less, assuming the research is accurate.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Sep 23, 2011 at 10:44 AM
  14. kill dank
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2010
    Posts:
    6,471
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    13
    St. Patrick's Day 2013

    kill dank Hero

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    If you're a female, you go back in time, fuck your grandfather, have his child, then go back to the present.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Sep 23, 2011 at 10:57 AM
  16. Dave.
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Posts:
    1,974
    Referrals:
    5
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    Dave. I dont Trade
    Do Not Trade

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    No, people time travel all the time, even though it is a tiny amount.

    For example

    If you flew on a plain for 24hours straight and got off you would be younger than you would have been if you had not got on the plain.

    It's an interesting find, but id like to see more test results, for example over a larger area other than 450miles.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:06 AM
  18. Gurtaton
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Posts:
    2,912
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Gurtaton Grand Master

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Parallel universes. I know it would be sort of stupid to go back to the past to fuck a grandfather who's not actually your grandfather, but that's one possible explanation...

    I personally think it'll be a LONG time before we start time traveling (but I'm still skeptic if it's even possible), but if this is confirmed to be true, then that changes a lot of things.
     
  19. Unread #10 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:11 AM
  20. Determinate
    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2010
    Posts:
    10,394
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Determinate Legend
    Banned

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Yea nvm. I had been thinking about it from the male perspective.

    At least it sounds more or less feasible that way, if not at all practical.
     
  21. Unread #11 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:42 AM
  22. fredecus
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts:
    884
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    9

    fredecus Apprentice

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Wait, if the particles are moving faster than the speed of light that means the particles are going back in time right?
     
  23. Unread #12 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:45 AM
  24. Dave.
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Posts:
    1,974
    Referrals:
    5
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    Dave. I dont Trade
    Do Not Trade

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    In theory, yes.
     
  25. Unread #13 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:52 AM
  26. fredecus
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts:
    884
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    9

    fredecus Apprentice

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Well in that case wouldnt the particles reach the destination slower?
     
  27. Unread #14 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:53 AM
  28. Dave.
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Posts:
    1,974
    Referrals:
    5
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    Dave. I dont Trade
    Do Not Trade

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    No, please explain how you came to that conclusion?
     
  29. Unread #15 - Sep 23, 2011 at 11:59 AM
  30. fredecus
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts:
    884
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    9

    fredecus Apprentice

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Well if your going back how could you reach something in the future? Like if it leaves destination A traveling faster than the speed of light (and in theory going back in time) how would it reach destination B unless it decelerates?

    Im probably just confused lol.
     
  31. Unread #16 - Sep 23, 2011 at 12:05 PM
  32. Dave.
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Posts:
    1,974
    Referrals:
    5
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    Dave. I dont Trade
    Do Not Trade

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    it would just reach the point quicker than light would have, technically the particles would have gone back in time, but it would be so miniscule you would only be able to tell by highly sensitive equipment.
     
  33. Unread #17 - Sep 23, 2011 at 12:08 PM
  34. SexayMistahBee
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Posts:
    2,410
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    27
    Discord Username:
    SexayMistahBee

    SexayMistahBee Sexiest Bee On Earth
    $50 USD Donor New

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Since we're talking about time travel and the grandfather paradox, I'll give a mindfuck quiz to everybody.

    A baby girl is mysteriously left at an orphanage in Cleveland in 1945. "Jane" grows up lonely and dejected, not knowing who her parents are, until one day in 1963 she is strangely attracted to a drifter. She falls in love with him. But just when things are finally looking up for Jane, a series of disasters strike. First, she becomes pregnant by the drifter, who then disappears. Second, during the complicated delivery, doctors find that Jane has both sets of sex organs, and to save her life, they are forced to surgically convert "her" to a "him." Finally, a mysterious stranger kidnaps her baby from the delivery room. Reeling from these disasters, rejected by society, scorned by fate, "he" becomes a drunkard and drifter. Not only has Jane lost her parents and her lover, but he has lost his only child as well. Years later, in 1970, he stumbles into a lonely bar, called Pop's Place, and spills out his pathetic story to an elderly bartender. The bartender offers the drifter the chance to avenge the stranger who left her pregnant and abandoned, on the condition that he (Jane) join the "time travelers corps." Both of them enter a time machine, and the bartender drops off the drifter in 1963. The drifter is strangely attracted to a young orphan woman, who subsequently becomes pregnant. The bartender then goes forward nine months, kidnaps the baby girl from the hospital, and drops off the baby in an orphanage back in 1945. Then the bartender drops off the thoroughly confused drifter in 1985, to enlist in the time travelers corps. The drifter eventually gets his life together, becomes a respected and elderly member of the time travelers corps, and then disguises himself as a bartender and has his most difficult mission: a date with destiny, meeting a certain drifter at Pop's Place in 1970.

    Now draw Jane's family tree.
     
  35. Unread #18 - Sep 23, 2011 at 12:09 PM
  36. fredecus
    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2010
    Posts:
    884
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    9

    fredecus Apprentice

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Okay, I understand now. I was really overlooking the fast that its only a 60 nanosecond difference.
     
  37. Unread #19 - Sep 23, 2011 at 12:45 PM
  38. Dave.
    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2008
    Posts:
    1,974
    Referrals:
    5
    Sythe Gold:
    1

    Dave. I dont Trade
    Do Not Trade

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    Space and time travel is so confusing lol :p
     
  39. Unread #20 - Sep 23, 2011 at 3:14 PM
  40. Imagine
    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Posts:
    3,375
    Referrals:
    4
    Sythe Gold:
    5
    Chess Master

    Imagine Grand Master

    Subatomic particles travelling FASTER than the Speed of Light.

    It might be true, but I believe that what really happened was that the neutrinos actually skipped through dimensions or something similar, and I believe that light would still be the fastest thing in the world if they stayed in the same dimension.
     
< weirdest thing you've done when drunk | Your vehicles! >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site