K1ng_Kl1ck Member Joined Dec 13, 2009 Sythe Gold 0 Messages 63 Age 35 Apr 7, 2013 #42 Might vote yes, doesnt make much difference.
flaxpro91 Newcomer Joined Apr 6, 2013 Sythe Gold 0 Messages 20 Apr 7, 2013 #43 I voted yes lol, it's a lot of work to get the reqs for addy gloves and if a pure wants to do it just for the extra str lvl why not.
I voted yes lol, it's a lot of work to get the reqs for addy gloves and if a pure wants to do it just for the extra str lvl why not.
I use range Hero Joined Jul 13, 2008 Sythe Gold 0 Messages 6,062 Apr 7, 2013 #44 i voted no, they made it eligible in 2009 for a reason
0 07 Jadz Active Member Joined Mar 16, 2013 Sythe Gold 0 Messages 130 Apr 7, 2013 #45 NO. Pure is pure for a reason, they shouldn't even be allowed mith gloves, nevermind addy... it defeats the object of defence.. addy gloves SHOULD require 30 defence etc.. No Support from me.
NO. Pure is pure for a reason, they shouldn't even be allowed mith gloves, nevermind addy... it defeats the object of defence.. addy gloves SHOULD require 30 defence etc.. No Support from me.
M magicfool Active Member Joined Aug 19, 2005 Sythe Gold 0 Messages 159 Apr 9, 2013 #46 Nope. Mith was fine in '07 and it's fine now.
lol12 Forum Addict Joined Apr 7, 2013 Sythe Gold 0 Messages 582 Location Lithuania Apr 9, 2013 #47 Voted no.