The Sex Trade

[SkyHighDreamer]

Using prostitutes unacceptable they are unaware desperate we shouldn't abuse this watching porn hell ya having a good masturbation is one of the things I look forward to the pornstars are much more aware and have made a conscious decision they are sort of actors that get paid well and looked after furthermore they are checked for stds which make them less vulnerable

 

[TTnos]

i think porn is good stuff same with strippers as that is a talent, i have banged a few escorts (prostitutes) and to tell you the truth they are just lazy people, $250 an hour because they are lazy fucks and a lot of them are on cocaine etc

 

[Valentinas]

Your arguments are based on emotions when this isn't an emotional business. The business is of gratification, and if there is consent on both sides of the deal then why shouldn't it be allowed. What right do you have to tell people that they can't sell their body or buy another's time for sexual gratification? A moral argument isn't a good argument because morals are thing of perspective.

Sometimes, it's good to be left with common moral & avoid the ''logic'' you use, if we use that, the human society will go outside the pattern of homo sapiens.

 

[Drugs]

Its the oldest professional cos it will always have a supply and demand.

This user has been infracted for spamming the SFA.

 

[Emperor Nero]

Sometimes, it's good to be left with common moral & avoid the ''logic'' you use, if we use that, the human society will go outside the pattern of homo sapiens.

There is no such thing as common morals. As I said morals are subjective based on cultural norms. The pattern of homo sapiens? What are you even talking about? We aren't going to devolve into some sub-sapien being for not sharing your morals.

Humans are not the only animals that actively participate in prostitution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_among_animals

 

[Valentinas]

There is no such thing as common morals. As I said morals are subjective based on cultural norms. The pattern of homo sapiens? What are you even talking about? We aren't going to devolve into some sub-sapien being for not sharing your morals.

Humans are not the only animals that actively participate in prostitution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_among_animals

I'm aware of subjective moral. If we would agree on objective moral we have to agree on a higher source as a base for the moral. Which is most unlikely.

Of course you're not going to be sub-humans just 'coz you don't agree with me, I just find it people disgusting when people follow what they find as 'logical' or ''as long as it don't harm anyone' instead of any sense in the substanse.

 

[Emperor Nero]

What you're arguing is ridiculous. There is no base morals or objective morals, and morals aren't even part of this discussion pertaining to the sex trade. Your argument is flawed because you are basing it on a flawed set of morals that vilify sexual activity because one has paid for it. Prostitution is just like any other service. Do you ever go to a movie theater? That is a service that offers entertainment. Ever go out to a restaurant? It is a proven fact that food does the same thing as sex, it produces endorphins in the body which are the feel good chemicals. You are paying for a service and is there anything wrong with that? Culture and so-called morals have forced sexual activity into a mold. What is so inherently wrong with paying for sexual gratification? Can you explain that? Besides saying morals, that is a cop out and isn't a real answer. You are failing to make any real point, as in a quantified or hard measure, as to why sexual gratification cannot be for sale.

 

[malakadang]

I'm aware of subjective moral. If we would agree on objective moral we have to agree on a higher source as a base for the moral. Which is most unlikely.

No, what makes you think objectivity implies a higher source.

Of course you're not going to be sub-humans just 'coz you don't agree with me, I just find it people disgusting when people follow what they find as 'logical' or ''as long as it don't harm anyone' instead of any sense in the substanse.

You find it offensive when people take the position of not harming anyone? Regardless, you previously said to 'avoid' logic with regards to morality, yet, you tried to justify your point logically, and you tried to justify your moral stance logically. That is an extreme contradiction. The only way that isn't a contradiction is if you were being irrational, and tried to justify your claims irrationally.

 

[Boofer]

The sex trade is not something I would get involved with. You could imagine that children, who get kidnapped have no choice in the matter. Opportunity and ambitions are qualities of the people that are involved. A strange man has the opportunity to abduct a child, and is ambitious enough to walk over and do it.

 

[kill dank]

I think we should let people do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt people. Maybe the prostitutes with a disease have to get a tattoo or something that says the disease(s) so people know. You'd probably have to implement that on a state level though first just to test it out since some people may not like it. Price regulation wouldn't be such a bad thing either.

 

I think we should let people do whatever they want as long as it doesn't hurt people. Maybe the prostitutes with a disease have to get a tattoo or something that says the disease(s) so people know. You'd probably have to implement that on a state level though first just to test it out since some people may not like it. Price regulation wouldn't be such a bad thing either.

Yeah, spread of STD's would be one of the main things to watch out for. As for other elements of the sex trade, they're fine as they are tbh.

 

[Noam]

Statistics show a cop is more likely to hire a prostitute than to arrest one. This obviously shows a gap in some governmental logic on the topic. As for sex toys and porn, I still don't see anything to debate about that. If you want to see it, go ahead; if you think it's blasphemy, ignore it.