Discussion in 'RuneScape 2007 General' started by Occurance, Jan 25, 2018.
Does flicking styles in stakes actually do anything between defence and Flick
ya invisible + 3 bonus on def invisible + 3 att on accurate and + 2 on the other one i think i know it doe make a few percent difference
I've always used lash back to def then flick to finish.. but tbh.. its all rng IMO
Flick and deflect if you change attack styles, only deflect if not.
Doesn't it matter if you start with Pid or not ?
Not sure but I’ve never changed styles during a duel and I have a positive w/l record
It's less then a % difference but in the long run it's worth it. That's if you pull it off consistently.
I think this will help you
i dont think in max fights it matters imo :/
i find its better
It does help, but if you don't have pid you have to delay your hit a bit so that you're actually switching hits with your opponent. If you both hit at the same time it won't matter if you change the attack styles.
I always wondered if delaying your hit gives you more of a disadvantage than not switching? @Ice Queen
It's possible, because there is a slight possibility that your pid will switch mid fight. However, I believe it's worth it to delay the hit because the chance of that happening is very slim.
just dont stake.
It does a slight thing, yeah.
like 0,01% different a stake
It matters quite a bit for long term boxing stakes
As for tentacle ones, not much.
It's 50/50 you either win or you lose
Ye this is true af, rng is so random you never really know, but I still flick attack style and deflect on opposing hit, unless I have pid, then I don't mess with it at all, unless they stall a game tick, then i deflect hit with them, pid gives 5%.