Sin666

Alright I saw you post this in another peron's thread
"Kabal's dispute is pointless. He's arguing insufficient proof, but has presented no new evidence to support his claim. T4z supplied enough for a ban, and now the burden of proof is on Kabal to refute it with something more substantial than "I didn't do it." It remains unanswered because no mod is sufficiently moved by his empty defense to revoke a colleague's decision, and because he's really left nothing to answer. If Pen chooses to unban him, fine. If not, fine. I trust his decision either way."

You could of told me I only had to debate the evidence provided by t4z. I'll go ahead and do that now since he has none.

Alright here is his thread first up so I can make references to it:
http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=358732

His first piece of proof is an ip pic:
http://img167.imageshack.us/img167/2063/screenshotex0.png

That's not my ip, check my ip logs of any time I've logged onto sythe -.-

His second piece of proof is a picture of his account with nothing on it:
http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/8247/screenshot1ha5.png

That prooves what? Anyone could take that pic at any time it doesn't mean shit..

His next proof is an msn conversation:
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/3527/screenshotav2.png

He doesnt show that it is my email address he is talking to... just someone with a nickname the same as my own, could be any address

His next proof is a pm I sent him. I don't deny I pmed him, obviously the pm pic is there. I don't see how it proves I have done anything though. I pmed everyone who asked me to, I usualy copied and pasted the current convo so they knew it was me... I don't even see those words in the pm in the convo box pic.


Well i'm pretty sure I have refuted the evidence presented, even though it was not sufficient enough in the first place.


If I need to add anything else then please post and say so instead of just ignoring my threads, thank you.

 

I didn't say "bitch about every picture he supplied". Refute it with proof. You complain he sent you an invalid name and pass: prove it. You allege that's not you he's talking to on MSN: well, prove it with the real convo. You talked to him about the cape, now show that you never could have done it. If not with pictures, at least give a clear, logical response as to who he is, how far your agreement went, who asked you to send the PM, why you sent it, why he might have framed you, and whatever else. Your first appeal was brief, incomplete, and made no sense.