Should the U.S. intervene in Syria?

I can tell you that something is going to happen soon. I just got requests to re enlist. Normaly when they start sending out reenlistment papers shuts about to go down.

 

No, as the US have their fingers in enough pies already.

 

I can't say it in a better way.

 

Spot on my friend, spot on.

 

Nope, pretty sure it would make things worst.

 

Hell no. I'm from the Uk and both the U.S and my country disgust me. Don't care how many women and children they murder, countries they rape and pillage, just as long as they keep the oil flowing. Took China by force in 1900, faked the bombing of a Vessel to enact military intervention in Vietnam, faked WMD to rape Iraq to secure oil, bombed their own trade centres to get into Afghanistan, and now they use media to try seize newly found oil in Uganda - I'm sure you've all seen the video. Democracy is hypocracy.

 

Democracy is not only hypocracy - they're making war crimes and hopefully they will pay for it one day.

 

I think they could supply the rebels with ammuniton and weapons other than that no. You cannot force freedom on people they have to want it.

 

Tough question and at this time I am not going to vote, might wait for the oppinion of a few more people:

Although were I stand at the minute (I am Australian) is the fact that theese conflicts are not pinpointed in Syria, they are all around the world. And why are people arguing for America to step in? Because there is a media frenzy causing the world to seek the help of larger countrys (considering China and Russia are NOT supporting) to remove the threat, the fact is in the worlds history, civil conflicts are as common as sand on a beach, they have shaped us into what we have become and without one in Syria I don't see the people of Syria moving forward as a nation.