Reporting for Scamming Name 60m

In this post Sinatra is discussing about a sniping bot with another user which shows that he has strong knowledge on the topic of Sniping:

Here he talks about how "Easy the script is to write" :

Truly are a cherry picker of the generation. I said "apparently" as in I have no fucking idea and it's also has humour in it i.e master dicksucking sniper.

 

Tbh at this point @staff can I pay the 60m 07 towards @PanicRoom's misfortunate education?

 

[KLucius]

There's simply no possible way to know who could have sniped the name. Panic claimed it couldn't have been him because Sinatra double claimed, however taking names on fresh accounts takes about half a second per attempt. It's as simple as holding down the space bar.

Doesn't seem fair to me to roll out punishments while there's no proof either way but that's up to the mods. Though I can say Sinatra seems like a genuine person in the name business from my experience.

 

[PanicRoom]

Its one thing for someone to offer to pay online "To seem legit" but when they speak like this on sythe contradicting everything they say, what use is their reputation? Reputation has no avail here as if you READ THE PM, WE OUTLINE THE TOS CLEARLY. STATING: Once the name leaves the account he will pay me my money. We were both aware of the risks and he pmed me confirming the PM. Now you want to make it seem as if he can just ignore the TOS he created simply because he has had previous trades successfully? What about the 25+ other vouches I have? @KLucius

Gyazo - 2d4bcfb644beff7d2aec178f0f95e631.png

 

[KLucius]

Its one thing for someone to offer to pay online "To seem legit" but when they speak like this on sythe contradicting everything they say, what use is their reputation? Reputation has no avail here as if you READ THE PM, WE OUTLINE THE TOS CLEARLY. STATING: Once the name leaves the account he will pay me my money. We were both aware of the risks and he pmed me confirming the PM. Now you want to make it seem as if he can just ignore the TOS he created simply because he has had previous trades successfully? What about the 25+ other vouches I have? @KLucius

Gyazo - 2d4bcfb644beff7d2aec178f0f95e631.png

Sorry, I didn't mean to imply you sniped the name. The most likely scenario is it was sniped by a random person. But as I said, there's no way to know for sure so handing a punishment on either end seems unfair imo.

 

Its one thing for someone to offer to pay online "To seem legit" but when they speak like this on sythe contradicting everything they say, what use is their reputation? Reputation has no avail here as if you READ THE PM, WE OUTLINE THE TOS CLEARLY. STATING: Once the name leaves the account he will pay me my money. We were both aware of the risks and he pmed me confirming the PM. Now you want to make it seem as if he can just ignore the TOS he created simply because he has had previous trades successfully? What about the 25+ other vouches I have? @KLucius

Gyazo - 2d4bcfb644beff7d2aec178f0f95e631.png

It honestly amazes me how much you're trying to portray me as a bad guy when I've repeatedly told you that I do not care what happens, as I will listen to the mods in the end. You sit here and try to tarnish my name, so are you expecting me to just politely cater your fragile heart? You also keep trying to rush this process too, which again, add to your sketchy behavior.

 

[tMoon]

Seems this has diverged into spam/conversation. We cannot be sure who sniped it, but Sinatra claimed responsibility.

@Young_Sinatra pay the 60M

Closed