Remove RuneScape Market Sub-Forum

Bump.

 

[DGod']

I don't support the deletion of the sub-forum but I would like to see the sub-forum altered to level 100-130 instead. The range between 60-130 combat is too great and the forum would end up being cluttered imo.

 

[jolter]

Support the modification of the account trading sub-forum as I haven't heard of any 138 pures..

 

[KerokeroCola]

http://screensnapr.com/v/RyT8RB.png <<< This is why I don't think this should ever happen. These are all legitimate pures, and there are a lot of them. Restricting such a large volume of accounts into one section is not ideal.

As a fix to the problem you've outlined, superman, I've proposed a re-defining "pure" in the SL. It'll allow for "defense pures" in addition to other types of accounts, so that the 100+ section has some legitimate accounts. The results of this proposition will obviously come forth once they are decided.

 

http://screensnapr.com/v/RyT8RB.png <<< This is why I don't think this should ever happen. These are all legitimate pures, and there are a lot of them. Restricting such a large volume of accounts into one section is not ideal.

As a fix to the problem you've outlined, superman, I've proposed a re-defining "pure" in the SL. It'll allow for "defense pures" in addition to other types of accounts, so that the 100+ section has some legitimate accounts. The results of this proposition will obviously come forth once they are decided.

If the sections aren't going to be merged, the definition of "pure" really has to change.

 

[chinesekid]

i agree +1

 

[Rabo Bank]

I support this, it has to be fixed. Goodluck!

 

[KerokeroCola]

If the sections aren't going to be merged, the definition of "pure" really has to change.

I think it has to change, no matter what. Why do we not allow 75-def, high summoning, high HP accounts to be pures? These are some of the most effective pkers in the wilderness.

 

I think it has to change, no matter what. Why do we not allow 75-def, high summoning, high HP accounts to be pures? These are some of the most effective pkers in the wilderness.

I believe the rule is in place just to stop people from posting their mains in the section. (accounts with 83 attack, 86 strength, 81 defense or random accounts like that)

 

[Zerkerfist]

I definitely support this idea. It can be quite confusing and the threads are always getting moved back and forth. The 60-130 sub forum under Pures and Skillers would be fantastic. It would mostly contain all the characters that are in the 60-99 section already (zerkers, tanks etc) but you could also throw in those accounts that kind of sit right on the edge (like barrows pures, or maxed mid accounts that are basically mains, except specifically set up for PKing, ex. with lower defence than a regular main like within the 70-80 range).

I think this would make it significantly less confusing, aswell as seperating the high level range accounts that are designed specifically for PKing, like barrows or 75 def pures, from the regular main accounts. Good idea you got here

 

[j bounce]

great idea i fully support,its confusing the way it is now.

 

[xEALEx]

I support this. Would make the section much more understandable and less confusing.

 

I suppose that, with the new announcement/definition of a pure, that this suggestion will be denied. Is this true?

 

[Muthaphukka]

Reasonable idea, wouldn't harm anyone and will unclutter a lot of threads....I support.

 

[Chivava]

I sadly have to disagree after a second thought, as Berserkers are stated as Pures in my opinion.