No man should ever hit a woman rule

After having a pretty heated debate on Youtube over this subject, I decided to bring forth this subject to the sythe SFA community to discuss this topic.

Do you think, under any circumstance, that it is morally just to use violence against a woman?

do you think that the "no hitting woman" rule is unfair/irrational/simple-minded?

Is this a form of inequality that should be erased from a society that strives for equality?

My opinions on this subject is that the "no hitting women" rule is garbage and enables women to use violence against men. Time and time again, I have seen women hide behind this rule and use it as a shield to protect themselves from the consequences of hitting a man.

Personally, I have been in a relationship with an abusive woman as well as had female enemies who continually used their woman status to use violence against me with no fear of violent retaliation, because violent retaliation from me, a male, would had resulted in me getting my ass kicked as well as being arrested by the police.

Anyways, enough of my rambling. What are YOUR opinions on this subject? I'm curious to see what you guys have to say.

 

In self-defense, sure. But I don't think the male should ever strike first. There is a significant difference in physical strength between man and woman, so a man beating a woman is not a fair match.

 

I wouldnt hit her,I would tap her. :]

 

Schnell sounds right to me

 

That's kind of a difficult subject. There are times when a women wants to be equal to a man. What I mean by that is that they yell at you and get in your face, and I don't think they should do that because a man is physically stronger and if he gets mad he might case a lot of harm, and then people will be mad because He hit a woman.

 

I agree with Schell. :- )