Link to scammer's Sythe profile: http://www.sythe.org/member.php?u=230104
Briefly explain the trade: The trade was for a prayer pure for $170
How they scammed: He is refusing to refund me 100% and he said I pissed him off when I told him that I agreed to him giving me the correct info, and blocked me.
Proof that you were not talking to an impostor: In the SS
If you take a close look at the screenshot Nate uploaded of our convo, you will see that I only agreed to this trade under the impression that Nate was giving me the CORRECT info:
http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/507/s06qs.png
Nate did not know if the info was correct or not (because he had not tested it), but he stated that it was correct when selling it to me. I only agreed because of that, so that even if it was hacked, I could retrieve it with ease. I would never have done such a big trade like this one if I had known.
I agreed. I think, because of the fact that I could not retrieve the account with the 'correct' info he provided me with, he owes me a 100% refund. He offered me a 50% refund, and he kept telling me, "You are pissing me off by asking for a full refund. I am being generous by offering you a 50% refund, so tell me your PayPal and I'll just send it." (The quote is not exact, but a general summary of the implications of our convo on MSN). I do not think he owes me a 50% refund, even out of 'generosity' I think he owes me a 100% refund, just to be fair.
I PMed FireZ and this is what he replied:
Now, please tell me if my argument is valid? Put friendships aside and do what is fair. I, personally think I deserve a 100% refund.
Thanks,
-Pola
Briefly explain the trade: The trade was for a prayer pure for $170
How they scammed: He is refusing to refund me 100% and he said I pissed him off when I told him that I agreed to him giving me the correct info, and blocked me.
Proof that you were not talking to an impostor: In the SS
If you take a close look at the screenshot Nate uploaded of our convo, you will see that I only agreed to this trade under the impression that Nate was giving me the CORRECT info:
http://img833.imageshack.us/img833/507/s06qs.png
Nate did not know if the info was correct or not (because he had not tested it), but he stated that it was correct when selling it to me. I only agreed because of that, so that even if it was hacked, I could retrieve it with ease. I would never have done such a big trade like this one if I had known.
I agreed. I think, because of the fact that I could not retrieve the account with the 'correct' info he provided me with, he owes me a 100% refund. He offered me a 50% refund, and he kept telling me, "You are pissing me off by asking for a full refund. I am being generous by offering you a 50% refund, so tell me your PayPal and I'll just send it." (The quote is not exact, but a general summary of the implications of our convo on MSN). I do not think he owes me a 50% refund, even out of 'generosity' I think he owes me a 100% refund, just to be fair.
I PMed FireZ and this is what he replied:
FireZ said:
Now, please tell me if my argument is valid? Put friendships aside and do what is fair. I, personally think I deserve a 100% refund.
Thanks,
-Pola
