Pirates input on secnx vs dragondyce report

[Bubly]

To summarize the situation here

• Secnx was a host in dragondyce
• He "incentivized" other hosts to scam by letting them hold onto funds over their established limit for various reasons
• Pirate responds saying it makes sense for him to be held liable for these people scamming

i don't really see the issue here, if i'm getting this correctly... a host had a max value they could hold, u knew that this host had a max value, but allowed him to go over it, thus giving him the opportunity to scam quit. the owners of said clan forced u to pay what the host scam quit, as long as this money was paid to the customers, i don't really see anything wrong with it

I understand secnx might be difficult to work with but a few important points

• He was not an Administrator / Manager within Dragondyce, therefore the ultimate responsibility for things like this should be on dragondyce management
• They chose to continue letting him operate within Dragondyce, despite it not being a partnership they could handle
• The actions of dragondyce management lead directly to people getting scammed

If they are letting people host who scam while holding a few times their max, they probably should have a better vetting process instead of just saying all the blame is on the moronic host they let stay with them.

 

Hey,

You should most likely wait till the report closes before questioning anything on a report, as it could still close another way, secondly, I think this more belongs on @Pirate feedback than here: Pirate's Feedback

 

[Bubly]

Hey,

You should most likely wait till the report closes before questioning anything on a report, as it could still close another way, secondly, I think this more belongs on @Pirate feedback than here: Pirate's Feedback

My reason for posting is more so that I believe dragondyce should be facing some sort of action for allowing all of this to happen, and I mentioned Pirates response because him calling them out on it was completely absent. I think what Pirate DID mention (secnx being responsible for repaying any victims) is agreeable.

 

I think the whole thing was a shitshow. It should of been locked while staff were gathering their input on it as it was dragged out WAYYYY too far. If it was that Sexc was a "scammer" then that should have also been nipped as well

 

secnx rightfully shouldve won both those court cases