Pikachu (ABM) Issue

I'm very confused as to why @Pikachu moved my maxed pure out of the 1 defense section simply because it has 2 def which is obviously not on purpose. This did not change the combat level of the account at all and should most definitely still be considered a 1 def pure as I'm sure everyone would consider it that type of account. I don't think it was right to move it out since I wont have the correct buyers looking at the account if its not in the 1 defense pure section.. A mod moved it in the 1 defense pure section originally for a reason. Can someone please get this moved back?

This is the account below.
⭐[$100 Donor] Selling MAXED PURE 99 Agility, 99 Strength, 99 Range, 99 Magic, 90 Construction⭐

 

Okay lets be obvious here. People will consider this a 1 defense pure when they are looking to buy a 1 defense pure especially considering its a maxed pure.. Cmon now no one would be upset that this is in the 1 def pure section because it was accidentally bumped up to 2 defense which didn't affect the combat level at all. This is a very unnecessary issue.

 

I think that forum needs to be changed from 1 defense pures to 1-20 defense pures.

They all seem to fit the same general category.

 

It doesn't even have to be expanded that much honestly. But when it comes to ONE defense level that didn't affect the accounts combat level at all like come on seriously that's just unnecessary to move it out.

 

I agree that 2 defence belongs in that section because at the end of the day, it is a "no defence pure" and that unless maliciously advertised as 1 defence, it does belong there. Doubt there is a more suitable section for it and it is unfair to @XYZelite to push that account into other account sections, as it definitely would not receive the deserved traffic.

 

Yeah honestly I agree with you I just think Pika is following rules to a T.

 

Fuck man I'd sue your school rather than come here for this bs. Where did they teach you 1=2?

Combat pure

I don't think a 2 defense fits any of those definitions.

 

Let us know which other category it fits, please

 

Main lol, if you believe a 2 def pure = 1 def pure then you also believe that any other person's account who was ruined by leveling 1 def to a 2 def doesn't deserve a refund from the offending party (given that they purchased a service rather than ruining it on their own)

 

Mains, are just mains.. Quoted from the fandom itself " Combat pure, a player who works primarily on raising certain combat skills high " Thus, it still being a pure.

From the wiki: A combat pure is an account which is created primarily for the purpose of efficient (usually PvP) combat. Combat pures train specific combat skills, while deliberately keeping other combat skills at a minimum in order to excel in certain aspects of combat at a comparatively low combat level.

Now, honestly I'd have someone suggest renaming that section to deter more issues such as this. In my opinion, I'd keep it in the 1 Defence section as its 1 level, and doesnt effect the combat any. If you want, a combat calc is available almost anywhere on the internet, you can check the facts yourself I wont get anymore involved.

 

2 def isn't as efficient as 1 def.

 

Pretty much sums up what we should do since all pures are this defence bracelet.

 

I know this is a real complaint that you're posting about (and for the record, I agree that this is intended to be a one defence pure so it should be in the one defence section). However, I can't lie. It's pretty funny that he moved it.

 

Funny.
So if a pure accidentally got its attack to 61 attack instead of 60 you wouldnt consider it a 60 attack pure?
Or if a 70 def account accidentally got to 71 defense does it not belong in the "70 defense builds" section?
That makes no sense its not even changing the combat level..

A 2 defense pure clearly isnt a main that makes no sense what so ever are you trolling or being serious?

It is funny and I was very surprised when he removed to move it back to the 1 def section lol. It was put in the 1 defense section to start with for a reason. It's obvious

I think its obvious that this account would still be considered a 1 def pure and Im sure 99% of people would agree.. I can guarantee absolutely no one would be upset that a 2 defense maxed pure is in the 1 defense section... It shouldn't even have been moved out.