Pedophiles?

[Pikachuâ„¢]

What do you think should happen to peadophiles to get help?


i think they should have their penis chopped off.

cast your ideas.


pikachu.

 

[Jobby]

Pedophiles aren't neccesarily male

define: pedophile; paedophile; an adult who is sexually attracted to children

 

[Pikachuâ„¢]

I know but still

i wouldnt mind being subject to peadphillia by a woman

na joking its all sick

 

[Quhx]

Eww, all Pedophiles should jus' /burn to be honest. Thats all I have to say, I think I speak for everyone when I say burn.

 

[Shredderbeam]

Well, let's think. By pedophiles, are you referring to people who are sexually attracted to children, or people who sexually abuse children?

If a person is a normal person who happens to have a sexual attraction to children, and they do nothing wrong, why is it so morally abhorrent?

If a person has a sexual attraction to children, and has a sexual encounter with them, and it doesn't affect the children negatively, why is it so morally wrong?

If a person has a sexual attraction to children, and has a sexual encounter with them that leaves them mentally broken and scarred, then I can accept that as being wrong.

 

[Boneless Delight]

They should be hanged.

 

[Shredderbeam]

They should be hanged.

Why? In material terms, what would that accomplish?

 

[Terrankiller]

People my age might have a girl friend or boy friend (or both?) in High School still.

19.

Edit:

I don't btw.

 

[waff3n]

Well, let's think. By pedophiles, are you referring to people who are sexually attracted to children, or people who sexually abuse children?

If a person is a normal person who happens to have a sexual attraction to children, and they do nothing wrong, why is it so morally abhorrent?

If a person has a sexual attraction to children, and has a sexual encounter with them, and it doesn't affect the children negatively, why is it so morally wrong?

If a person has a sexual attraction to children, and has a sexual encounter with them that leaves them mentally broken and scarred, then I can accept that as being wrong.

I think he is talking about men who abuse children, and leave them broken and unable to function as normal human beings, which is more or less the result in like 98% of the cases.

In the last 2% of the cases its wrong because the children can not to choose if they want to have sex with this sweaty old man or not,
No 5-10 year old child wants to have sex, not with an old man either.

As for my own oppinion, i think they should be kicked in the nuts by children untill they become steril, and then /burn for a long time

 

[MST]

I think they shud get a life^^

 

[Shredderbeam]

I think he is talking about men who abuse children, and leave them broken and unable to function as normal human beings, which is more or less the result in like 98% of the cases.

Well, is it the case in 98% of all cases? Is there a source for that number? I don't question it, but I do like claims to be backed by facts.

In the last 2% of the cases its wrong because the children can not to choose if they want to have sex with this sweaty old man or not,
No 5-10 year old child wants to have sex, not with an old man either.

Well, a 5-10 year old child might not be able to choose, but then again, they might. It varies from person to person.

As for my own oppinion, i think they should be kicked in the nuts by children untill they become steril, and then /burn for a long time

Oh, what would that accomplish?

I think they shud get a life^^

I didn't know that all of them, with no exceptions, had no life. Can I see your source?

 

[Pikachuâ„¢]

well said.

 

[pink pak]

to be honest i think they should
1. be tagged
2. receive the best proffessional help (after the child)
3. have to pay for the childs help
4. serve a 25 year sentance
5. not be alowed near certain public places.

 

[Pikachuâ„¢]

very well said but

still i think killing them is good idea.

 

[Shredderbeam]

to be honest i think they should
1. be tagged

Why?

2. receive the best proffessional help (after the child)

Why are they in needing of help?

3. have to pay for the childs help

If the child is traumatized, then I suppose that's reasonable.

4. serve a 25 year sentance

Why so long?

5. not be alowed near certain public places.

What, are they going to forcibly molest children in public?

still i think killing them is good idea.

Why? What material good does that accomplish?

 

[Pikachuâ„¢]

Why?



Why are they in needing of help?



If the child is traumatized, then I suppose that's reasonable.



Why so long?



What, are they going to forcibly molest children in public?



Why? What material good does that accomplish?

No offence shredd

seems like ur protecting the peado's

they need a long sentace

 

[Shredderbeam]

No offence shredd

seems like ur protecting the peado's

they need a long sentace

But why? And why should they be killed?

 

[Pikachuâ„¢]

Because its disgraceful to do such a thing.

 

[waff3n]

Well, is it the case in 98% of all cases? Is there a source for that number? I don't question it, but I do like claims to be backed by facts.

No facts just guessing, but since 85 to 90% of all abuse occurs at the hands of an adult who knows the child, the adult is in a position of trust, most children in that age, will without a doubt take some sort of damage from that, from being raped/abused by someone they trust

Well, a 5-10 year old child might not be able to choose, but then again, they might. It varies from person to person.

Did you, when you were 10 years old want to have a 18-?? year old mans penis inside your anus? im guessing no, and i think everyone would agree to that, and if you ask anyone in that age their answer would be the same, i think.

Oh, what would that accomplish?

It would accomplish that the individual would not harm any more children.

 

[Shredderbeam]

Why? What makes it disgraceful?

Did you, when you were 10 years old want to have a 18-?? year old mans penis inside your anus? im guessing no, and i think everyone would agree to that, and if you ask anyone in that age their answer would be the same, i think.

Maybe it would. Maybe not. You can't really make a general statement for all people.

It would accomplish that the individual would not harm any more children.

Methinks it would accomplish the satiation of your lust for revenge, hence the sterilization via kicking, and the burning to death.