skilling scott has paid more than agreed to, for months

Link the current Sythe account: skilling scott
Which violation you are reporting the user for: In our Transfer of Ownership Contract, he's refusing to pay me my 3% split on the company and profits
Why you think they're violating Sythe rules: This contract was made on sythe, skilling scott has brought up today that he is only supposed to be paying me 3% of the profits, not 3% total sales. In the contract it states I own 3% of the entire company AND profits, NOT I only get paid 3% of profits. Therefore skilling scott has told me he is not going to pay me anymore until I dispute on sythe. He is not honoring my payment, that was agreed in contract.
ex. if he has a 1b order, I technically own 3% of that sale right off the top (30m) and that would mean he owns 97% (970m). Since I have 100% say as stated in the contract I don't have to pay the worker any amount or staff, because I own 3% of that sale. Now he has 970m left to pay the workers and management.
Originally the splits were as follows. Worker 80% / Manager 5% / Manager 5% / skilling scott 7% / me 3%
Now the splits he want's as this Worker 80% / Manager 5% / Manager 5% / skilling scott 10% (me paid 3% his "profit")
Now he says I should ONLY be getting paid on profits even though the contract states the company AND profits, the definition of profit is "a financial gain, especially the difference between the amount earned and the amount spent in buying, operating, or producing something."
In his split system he calls 90% of that maintenance and his 10% profit.
So now he wants to ONLY pay me in profits, when the contract states again I own 3% of the company AND profits.
Owning 3% of the company is owing 3% of the initial sale. So I should be getting paid the initial 3% per sale, and then also 3% of his profits which he has agreed to on sythe in our Terms of transfer conversation contract.
Here is a link to images of the above situation and our discord PM's on the Subject: Contract Disagreement

 

To clarify I was paying him way over what I should when I realized told him he would be paid correct amount I agreed he kept 3% of company and profits ownership gets 10% os sales that 10% if profit what hes trying to do is extort me saying he owns 3% of company amd gets 30% nonprofit? And argued he gets 3% of my cut aswell? When this was agreed 3% of profit? Not 3% of every sale that's absurd! I am liable to pay upkeep on discord advertisements everything solely hes supposed to be getting just a small portion cause he didnt wanna do this anymore and it still gave him a small bit for resigning it over to me and not having to do absolutely anything to continue to pay him 30% of profit I make personally before I even count in my advertisement fees everything is robbery and I would like this settled with am outcome of me having full ownership so I dont need to be extorted.

 

As for he owns 3% he owns 3% of sale off the top pockets 30m? I own 97% do I pocket 97% of rhat sale nobody else gets nothing what hes trying to get is out rageous I realized while reviewing terms today I've been over paying him 10x the amount as he was earning 30% of profits not 3% he was entitled to when I realized my mistake I confronted him he should be glad he made so much more over that time.

 

To clarify if you happen to not look at discord messages, he's been paying me 3% of total sales as he does in all his splits, which isn't exactly specified in the Contract in that way but it's what has been happening, Now since he want's to pay me way less, i'm holding him accountable for what the contract actually says, which is 3% of company (total sales) AND profits.

 

The contract clearly stats he owns 3% of company and profits not 3% of company and 3% of total sales

 

What he is implying is he is getting 3% of all sales and 3% of my profit ontipnof that??? which is clearly not stated in the terms he even wrote out which is 3% of profits as he has 3 percent ownership inhave 97% ownership and keep 97 percent of profits the workers are paid 80% of jobs and management combined 10% leaving the profits at 10% of gross sales without counting advertisements I pay for solely or anything to be paying him 3% of gross sales which was not agreed on and 3% of my earning aswell is robbery for a man who just wanted to resign and not run the server at all i know i messed up overpaying him in past got hectic amd 3% so i dont expect to see that extra i paid back was my error i was correcting this issue moving forward which i had done wrong at start.

 

The definition of sales is "the activity or business of selling product"
The business is Slem's Services
They sell services for oldschool runescape
I own 3% of that business
Therefore I own 3% of that Sale

 

Also as a breach of the contract he has removed my admin from the server and the founder role from me as show in the Imagur

 

Yes with ongoing dispute he can have it back when a resolution is resolved so as nothing harmful can be done to the server in the time

 

Yes slemmy I know definition of sales your terms where you own 3% of business and 3% of profits generated that in no way entitles you to be taking 3% of gross sales to yourself essentially stealing from me in no way in any form did I agree you will have 3% of gross sales and 3% of profit aswell it was never agreed on and isnt a thing was never in contract either so there is nothing to dispute there.

 

The contract stipulates this:

Spoiler

Which was written by you, yourself. It's mind boggling that you didn't understand your own contract. It clearly states, 3% of the company and of the profits, not revenue. If @skilling scott has been giving you 3% of revenue up until now, then you can consider that good fortune, as he had no right to. On the contrary, @skilling scott has the right to reclaim all the extra funds he's paid you over the last 8 months and you could be DNT'd owing those.

However, after speaking to him, he's decided that he won't demand that money back, so long as he's able to break free from this contract and have full ownership of the company.

@PSlemmy staff have decided @skilling scott is free from this contract, that you no longer own 3% of the company and you're fortunate to not be DNT'd/owe those extra funds back to scott.