Why aren't MSN Histories proof?

I do not understand why MSN histories can not be used in the report a scammer section. The MSN History is still in there format, and I honestly don't see a MSN history being any harder to fake than a MSN conversation chat window. The MSN conversation Chat window even seems easier to me because you could just actually type out whatever you want in the window and just paste it wherever you want to make it look real, whereas the MSN History you would have to find a matching font to make a fake.

I just don't understand why one is more accepted than the other?

 

You make a good point. I'm going to wait to see what others have to say... this should be interesting.

 

It's because apparently they can be easily edited.

 

Easier to edit, but so is everything people do...if I'm good enough I could edit something to say Fear scammed me for something. But it'd be easier to edit a chat log than a msn message window.

 

Logs can be edited to say whatever with a right click. We can't accept them, sorry.