Latest signatures

[lntercourse]

What happened to the good old signatures/tags like these aye This forum is all about 3d . So yeah, this is my gallery of my latest works, I will be adding more and more and I make them. I sell them in a different forum as this forum doesn't really seem to be interested in them apart from some people, but nevertheless here is my latest works :

 

[Emperor Nero]

The big thing that I see as a problem with your work is text. The text on all of the pieces is off the mark. The first two pieces are fairly decent but the colors need work because they're hella monotone and there is way too much going on to create any real sense of flow. The third is pretty nice but for all of the lines, because using random lines for the sake of random lines isn't a good practice because it really ruins the depth.

Another big problem that threads throughout your work is the lack of lighting or the inconsistency of the lighting on the piece. The skrillex pieces have some weird soft brushing, while the daft punk sig doesn't have any form of lighting from the light strokes which there should be, and the dark beauty is oddly washed out so to prevent any real use of lighting. While on the topic of the dark beauty sig, it looks bland, boring, and monotone. The softbrushings don't lend well to being effects how you have used them here. They create neither a sense of flow nor depth and the washed out look just doesn't work for it because it washes out whatever effect c4d you were using.

 

[lntercourse]

The big thing that I see as a problem with your work is text. The text on all of the pieces is off the mark. The first two pieces are fairly decent but the colors need work because they're hella monotone and there is way too much going on to create any real sense of flow. The third is pretty nice but for all of the lines, because using random lines for the sake of random lines isn't a good practice because it really ruins the depth.

Another big problem that threads throughout your work is the lack of lighting or the inconsistency of the lighting on the piece. The skrillex pieces have some weird soft brushing, while the daft punk sig doesn't have any form of lighting from the light strokes which there should be, and the dark beauty is oddly washed out so to prevent any real use of lighting. While on the topic of the dark beauty sig, it looks bland, boring, and monotone. The softbrushings don't lend well to being effects how you have used them here. They create neither a sense of flow nor depth and the washed out look just doesn't work for it because it washes out whatever effect c4d you were using.

Thank you for taking your time and writing this, I will try to take the things you said into account and try implement them in my future signatures.

 

[Spraynwipe]

Definitely agree with Nero on the text part. Font choice is a bit off, seems too sharp and not bold enough in some pieces. There are some blending issues with the larger one with clouds. I'm not the biggest fan of the diagonal lines in the daft punk one either. I do like your colours in the skrillex one, I just feel that the bit of red in his logo and on his necklace throws it off, when there could have been more red incorporated in the background. I think that's my favourite one of them though, it stands out the most.

 

[stonebridge]

i love the last one with the joker. epic