resolved

[Resolved]

User I'm reporting : @Zora Zora

Zora is ban evading and has been for many years his previous

https://www.sythe.org/members/1355159/

"" Because Giant Goliath is the only person I rented my VPS to. I was messaged by a mod that this is not allowed so I stopped doing so after. And no, he set it all up via Teamviewer.

Going back and forth on this thread isn't going to help anything. I'll refrain from posting any further to prevent spam. I'll fully coorperate with any verification progress that Im asked to and to the mod/admin handling this, please contact me for any inquiries.""

This report was brushed under the rug but it showed clear evidence of Zora ban evading/Self vouching.

Zora was running a second sythe account with his partner Giant Goliath of which they both shared the same VPS/VPS's as admitted by Zora.

Zora claims the autobumper was used for other profiles on sythe.org but this is false? There wasn't a single other profile it was used for other than Giant Goliath and 1 other sythe scam banned user.

And the question that mods never asked is why does renting/how does renting a VPS to another individual allow them to access your sythe account?

And why when approached to "King" It was noted as "not being a match" when Zora admitted to "sharing" a vps with the scamming user who was banned for scamming, and somehow both logged into their sythe.org accounts on the same VPS?

Evidence was presented at the time, both had the exact same service layouts, the exact same thread layouts

Refer to this report:

[Resolved]

This is complete nonsense and was a cover up can an admin like @Andy @Techie look into this, it does not make sense that sharing a vps has meant that you BOTH logged into the same vps near the same time with the same IP

Other violations he has been apart of include knowingly undersending payments to individuals which he was not punished for proof:


which he felt necessary to mock in the sythe discord, it's a clear violation of trading practices, it's not something to mock about nor is it about the money but it's concept at the end of the day people are trusting you to send the full amount of money at hand.

This is the picture zoomed into:



Mocking the incident ^ this is not a great representation of somebody who is supposedly meant to enforce the rules of not undersending payments.

Other cases of clearing having the intent to be violating/abusing powers: