Proof that a Boeing 757 did NOT crash into the pentagon.

I was looking at some images, and I realized this.
So I made a crappy diagram.
This, along with Sythe's physics, and the 9/11 truth movement is makin some progress.
This diagram SUCKS- I will be making a much better one later.

 

Um, yeah, who in their right mind would think that a PLANE crashed there, everyone says it looked nothing like a 747.

 

It was a plane, just a different type.

757, by the way- not 747.

 

757? and that picture doesnt prove anything...

 

Right, some people think it was a rocket? Anything to say about that? I don't see how they could fly that plain into the pentagon, and someone not record it...with a phone or something.

 

That pic proves that the engine found in the wreckage was not a 757 engine, therefore it was not a 757 what slammed into the Pentagon.

 

There were lots of recordings, the only problem is that only 5 frames were ever released by the government. There is much more evidence about the lightpoles knocked over on the taxicab being stages as a photo-op, I'll upload that later. Some people thought it was a cruise missile, which runs on liquid fuel like a plane.

 

No, it was definitely a Boeing 757. Get your facts straight.

 

Ok you are right but how do you explain this?

757 landing gear found


757 engine rotor found (not the large one at the front, obviously, but one of the smaller ones inside)



757 wheel found


757 engine diffuser found


Size and shape of entry hole correspond well with a 757

^^ Size


^^ Shape


Need more?

 

Wow, strong evidence =/

 

wow, wrong evidence..


Dude, you proved YOURSELF wrong. 1.) There were NO fallable parts recovered, AND the size of the whole is not what you're showing.... the wings would have torn off, if it did crash like that, the pentagon is too reinforced. 2.) If it crashed like that, the entry whole (had it been able to penetrate the wall) would have been larger, and just not scorched. THe scorch marks came from the fire..

 

then why are you posting?


And it's not "believing what I want" it's believing evidence, repeated proof, means, method, and motivation.


I'm sorry, but in court, if you present those all in a organized manner, and it fits together (which it perfectly does) then the accused is found guilty.

The only reason reasonable doubt has been created is because people are too fucking stupid to understand anything. They believe they are safe inside their country, and as such are deaf and dumb to their countries mistakes.

 

The wings contain Fuel... What do you think that will happen when it explodes?

 

Yes, it will create a hole, or possibly damage the wall. HOWEVER, there was only small scorch marks which from the focal point of the center of the attack. Meaning the way the scorch marks were going, the actual explosion caused them, no wings were involved.


E: Grammar

 

Those two landing gears are slightly similar, but if you look carefully, completely different. By the way, the front gear of the 757 has TWO wheels. That gear has space for only one.

That engine rotor is the EXACT ONE I'm talking about in the diagram- that picture is with all the salvaged parts assembled.

Count the holes in the salvaged wheel base and compare it to the number of holes in the wheel from the REAL 757 you have the picture of next to it.

Okay, it's a diffuser. All plane engines have them, and they're all very similar. That one is too destroyed to accurately compare the features.

As to the last diagram.... that's a render. Compare it to the actual photo.
EDIT: Besides, the render itself is inaccurate, as you can clearly see the tips of the wings traveling into the red area.

 

There not idiots they look at the plane that went missing on the radar at the time and track it down and found out it was a 757. They really wouldn't lie about the plane that hit it, seriously, rofl.

 

^ where is your proof?








If you look to the left... of the picture.. there's a tree. which was CLEARLY in the way of the wing of the plane. It is HIGHER than the hole.. (that was an after picture, when the top collapsed) and if it was a 757, the wing would have destroyed that tree.



E: There were ALSO eye witnesses and media coverage that say it WAS NOT the way the government said it was.


E2: Here's one for you...

 

You, sir, are possibly the most unintelligent person to post on this thread so far.
EDIT: The controllers all thought it was a military plane. Check your sources.

There were also eyewitnesses that saw a cruise missile, a small Cessna, a black helicopter.... Plus, eyewitnesses can be planted.

 

^ exactly..

Like if you watched loose change recut ed 2, then you hear about the people who were professionals that proved it wrong.. a week later they were either unemployed, or changed their story..

Me smell conspiracy.

 

What tree?