Just a quick note: Infracting on spam

[ritchynator0]

Definition: Spam is the abuse of electronic messaging systems (including most broadcast media, digital delivery systems) to send unsolicited bulk messages indiscriminately. ...


I got infracted for saying "Post Count is not my goal in this community. It is to help the people make the right decisions and get the most out of it."

I don't see how this is spam. If anything it should be called an "unrelated post."

 

[Necromancer24]

Definition: Spam is the abuse of electronic messaging systems (including most broadcast media, digital delivery systems) to send unsolicited bulk messages indiscriminately. ...


I got infracted for saying "Post Count is not my goal in this community. It is to help the people make the right decisions and get the most out of it."

I don't see how this is spam. If anything it should be called an "unrelated post."

It is off topic then. Which is still against the rules.

 

[ritchynator0]

I was replying to a post which would mean that is it not off topic. However, if it must be, then these infractions should be specified carefully and not just put any old reason.

 

[Sindrefyrn]

I was replying to a post which would mean that is it not off topic. However, if it must be, then these infractions should be specified carefully and not just put any old reason.

It's the rules definition of spam which matters here, not yours.

 

[ritchynator0]

Can you give me the link as to where I can find the Sythe definition of Spam as I cannot find it?

 

[Sindrefyrn]

Can you give me the link as to where I can find the Sythe definition of Spam as I cannot find it?

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=148431

 

[ritchynator0]

Thanks.

"* Posting comments with little to no relevance to the topic" would be the closest it comes under.

But It had relevance as I was answering the persons comment before.


I still think that "infracters" should be much more careful when choosing to infract someone.

 

[Spyike]

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?t=852181

I infracted you for the spam post. Your post as already stated did not contribute to the thread.

 

[ritchynator0]

FIRST POST

"This method of infinite prayer has been around for more than two years and is currently known by four people including myself.
-----------------------------

I have seem numerous videos on this. Do not put things like this unless you are 100% certain about facts."





THREAD REPLY POST
"I am 100% certain of the facts. This ----->METHOD<----- of infinite prayer is only known by four people including myself. Yes, there have been other variations of this glitch found by noobs, but this METHOD has been withen our little bugging team for years and is currently only known by us and is still working. Now, please get out of this thread unless you have something to contribute besides a post count."



MY REPLY POST
"Post Count is not my goal in this community. It is to help the people make the right decisions and get the most out of it."










Are you sure?

 

[Skele]

Yes the infraction was warranted and no this is not the place to argue it. Please read this sticky: http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=842041