Infracted by Island in the Sand Box v2

Infracted by Island in the sand box

Please don't patronize me @Tmoe. You and I both know I could have made a thread in the dispute section, but deliberately chose not to do so. As you said, Richard is the highest level and he's more than capable of handing out a final ruling (there was a reason why he didn't close the thread himself).

If you really want to get into semantics, fine - There needs to be a overall consensus of what the sand box is/has turned into. Is it a branch of the spam forum as it was originally designed to be, or has it turned into completely else?? The rules in that particular section state light trolling is okay. By saying 'lol' on that thread, it was directed towards ChloeCat, the OP, who was perfectly capable of deleting the comment/infracting me herself when she saw my post.

 

I know this site is struggling to retain old users and attract new ones, but promoting 12 year old retards like @Island incapable of moderating and who have the arrogance and similar to that of Finn isn't the way to go and is doing way more harm than good.

 

Related: Astro's Feedback Thread

 

I'm not patronizing you, it's the wrong section and I also think Sythe has more important issues to handle then a simple infraction dispute.

A staff thread meant to refund scam victims in some form is not the place to "lightly" troll in sand box and the OP clearly states any posts not conforming to the thread requirements will be infracted.

Disputes denied, closed.