Obviously someone shouldn't be responsible for advertising someones site in your sig and that site scams. If someone makes their own thread advertising a website, whether they are a worker or the owner I guess is a different discussion. But for the sake of @ABM's suggestion, if someone creates their own thread advertising a website and that website scams I think they should be held responsible but I think a lot more can go into responsibility. Is the person that created the thread responsible for all the debt (amount scammed.) I support this, I would just like to see other peoples opinions as I'm on the fence since this is a broad subject. Thanks.