i now know why excelont was skipped over

Go make a suggestion about it

Wait so just to confirm, if I owe someone money from a previous dice bet, and a dice another person, if I roll badly I can say I owe someone else money from a previous dice bet and have that roll considered void correct?

 

[SPM322]

Wait so just to confirm, if I owe someone money from a previous dice bet, and a dice another person, if I roll badly I can say I owe someone else money from a previous dice bet and have that roll considered void correct?

Yes and excelont is a degenerate downy irl

 

Wait so just to confirm, if I owe someone money from a previous dice bet, and a dice another person, if I roll badly I can say I owe someone else money from a previous dice bet and have that roll considered void correct?

Yes and no, I have one extra step in my method to get you 100% successful results. Pm me for more info.

 

Wait so just to confirm, if I owe someone money from a previous dice bet, and a dice another person, if I roll badly I can say I owe someone else money from a previous dice bet and have that roll considered void correct?

@Excelont any reply?

 

@Excelont any reply?

Ay man i didnt make the decision, i just closed the thread

 

Ay man i didnt make the decision, i just closed the thread

Who made the decision? I'd like to ask them as this creates a gaping flaw in the dicing system which many could exploit, and it could screw people, including myself, over very badly.

 

Who made the decision? I'd like to ask them as this creates a gaping flaw in the dicing system which many could exploit, and it could screw people, including myself, over very badly.

That is how it is now stated yes. But normal people would understand that is not the way it works. But since we have idiots around this might as well be made a new rule to prevent scanning even more