I did not call someone a scammer without proof.

[I Want Milz]

Perhaps you guy's should have read the report a scammer area first. http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=402553 Clear proof that Radiophonic is a SCAMMER, and I got an unfair infraction, even though I gave evidence I think is conclusive enough to prove him to be a scammer. Even if in your opinion you think its not enough, I still think an infraction is too harsh. Please consider this, thank you.

 

[Eric]

In the thread, you called him a scammer, without proof.

 

[I Want Milz]

Your supposed to post the proof in every thread you accuse someone of it? I thought that's what the report a scammer sectionwas for. Can you atleast look at it please?

 

[Zypur]

Your supposed to post the proof in every thread you accuse someone of it?

Yes, read the rules.

The infraction will remain.