I support the theory of evolution and the immense amount of facts behind it. But one thing that's always puzzled me is how human evolution has been so constant, differing in skin color and facial structure at most
Darwin's theory of natural selection suggests the survival of the fittest, which is why other specIes and their different types have characteristics suited for their environments. I guess that birds are a good example?
But if then, why haven't humans evolved and to adapt to our environments?
For example, people from Exceptionally hot and cold regions do not have any unique physical characteristics. We all have the same physical characteristics, even tribes that have never had contact with the outer world.
my extreme expectation is the inuits being incredibly furry, and africans having thick humps, much like camels to store water
Can anyone enlighten me by telling me what I've missed?
Darwin's theory of natural selection suggests the survival of the fittest, which is why other specIes and their different types have characteristics suited for their environments. I guess that birds are a good example?
But if then, why haven't humans evolved and to adapt to our environments?
For example, people from Exceptionally hot and cold regions do not have any unique physical characteristics. We all have the same physical characteristics, even tribes that have never had contact with the outer world.
my extreme expectation is the inuits being incredibly furry, and africans having thick humps, much like camels to store water
Can anyone enlighten me by telling me what I've missed?





























