Hitler

So you basically don't believe in people speaking for themselves? I don't need to be manipulated, I have my own views and i'm sticking by them. He will try, but i'm not sure if he, himself will finish the job. He will set the building blocks and lay the foundation down.

.
It won't hold.

Technically, he took it as if he was rejected by the whole race. Otherwise, you wouldn't just stop at killing the people who rejected him.

 

the riddler when you said if you didn't want anything to do with it, you could leave what do you mean by that cause obviously you could not leave Germany if thats what you mean.

and you believe the Jews are to blame because an evil dictator decided he should exterminate all Jews?

 

The popular theory is around 20 million, Some say as high as 100 million (which I think is a bit high). Together with the lost of lives in WW2 and Hitler (Around 20 - 27 Mil). Russia would have lost close to 40 - 50 Million people. If the 100 million toll is believed together with the lost of life in WW2, Then their will be no one left in Russia. (May be 15 million at most).

What people believe about stalin ^.^

He no doubt killed more people than Hitler ever did, but the toll is still not something that can be counted.

 

I. I don't think Hitler was extremely smart. He failed his highschool studies and could not qualify the University entrance requirements. Although I'll admit he did have a natural talent for persuasion and public speaking.

II. You don't understand. For many years, Hitler promised German citizens that he would provide them with Lebensraum (living space). As the war stalled in the Western front against Britain and the African Campaign wasn't progressing much as well, a Blitzkrieg attack on the Soviet Union seemed logical. The Russians were not prepared for war, they thought the Soviet non aggresion pact with Germany would last til at least 1942-1943.

III. Lastly you're wrong again. The Soviet Union was pushing back, The British had resisted the Germans in both Britian and North Africa, the German reich was about to be invaded on three fronts. The United States although helped to win the war was not necessary for the victory of the allies against Germany. The United States played an important part however in destablising Japan and ending World War II in the eastern theater.

 

No. I'm sure the real reason was that MacArthur concluded an invasion of the Japanese mainland from Formosa and the Philliphines would take at least a year to achieve due to the impress loyalty of the people to the Emperor. They were sure there were several million Japanese men, women and children capable of carring suicide attacks/missions against American and allied soldiers.

Faced with dragging the war on another year and more Allied casaulties, the atomic bomb seemed a logical solution.

Sigh, read modern history before making remarks such as these to be honest. If you looked at it from the Japanese high command's point of view, their expansion into South East Asia was leading into an inevitable conflict with the British Empire. Also due to aggression of the Japanese in the Sino-Japanese II War and South East Asia, the USA virtually froze all of Japan's foreign assets and ceased exporting oil and other necessities to Japan. Japan out of options decided a suprise attack on the United State's only pacific fleet would paralyse the United States in the pacific and force the United States to sign a neutrality pact letting Japan to continue its Expansion into South East Asia and ultimately the Pacific theater.

 

That's why you will NEVER been Hitler. You have no idea and do not understand him. For over 24 years, he blamed most of Germany's INTERNAL and EXTERNAL problems on jews creating a strong image of anti-semitism in the Nazi Propraganda machine. How can he not go after the Jews if he hated them so much and with such passion he influenced over 4 million German citizens to believe the same?

Although I agree going after Stalin was an eventual mistake. No nation attacking Russa since Peter the Great in winter, has ever come out as the victor in the end.

this isnt entirely correct. France did infact surrender. Read this as quoted '

Prime Minister Paul Reynaud was forced to resign because he refused to agree to end the war. He was succeeded by Marshal Philippe Pétain, who delivered a radio address to the French people announcing his intention to ask for an armistice with Germany. When Hitler received word from the French government that they wished to negotiate an armistice, he selected the Compiègne Forest as the site for the negotiations. As Compiègne had been the site of the 1918 Armistice, which had ended World War I with a humiliating defeat for Germany, Hitler viewed the choice of location as a supreme moment of revenge for Germany over France. The armistice was signed on 22 June in the very same railway carriage in which the 1918 Armistice was signed (removed from a museum building and placed on the precise spot where it was located in 1918), Hitler sat in the same chair in which Marshal Ferdinand Foch had sat when he faced the defeated German representatives. After listening to the reading of the preamble, Hitler, in a calculated gesture of disdain to the French delegates, left the carriage, leaving the negotiations to his OKW Chief, General Wilhelm Keitel. The French Second Army Group, under the command of General Pretelat, surrendered the same day as the armistice and the cease-fire went into effect on 25 June 1940'.

After that France was basically divided into a German occupation zone with Pro-Nazi Officials governing France.

 

Hitler developed his hatred for jews while living the bohemian lifestyle he lived while he was rejected from the vienna arts school twice, then also because of the "stab in the back myth" and the november criminals from WW1

wilson, he convinced up to 15 million the same, not 4 million.

 

Wow, that's exactly what I said.

I never learned anything about the creation of the atomic bomb while in school. So don't blame it on them. If I make a mistake it's my fault (which I haven't here).

 

Then that's a flaw in the current american education, and has nothing to do with Hitler.

 

I know it has nothing to do with Hitler. I was just pointing out the obvious.

Your right that is a flaw in the American education system. Every student should at some point learn who created the most powerful weapon on the face of the Earth!

 

The most powerful weapon is religion.

Now back onto the topic of Hitler, nobody has brought up that Hitler was bullied as a child; this could be one of the reasons he grew up with his fermenting hatred.

 

at OP even with help from france and russia the united states still would have stopped hitler, especially once they became the only nation to have nukes at the time. tbh even if britain joined hitler, the usa still would have stopped them. also, to say hitler was very smart is a moronic thing to say seeing as his decisions destroyed germany in the long run.

 

It isn't moronic, he brought germany up from devastation and economic crisis, and brought employment and a stable economy. He managed to convince half the country that killing people since they are "racially inferior" is right. You try do that. I don't agree with his policies, he just managed to do what he wanted to in the beginning, so he was partially successful in what he did, meaning he was a very clever person indeed.

have you ever seen potassium in water?

 

You realize that you just said something really retarded. Russias main defence is the size of the country, but the second best defence is the climate. Hitler lost more then half his army to the bitter conditions of Russia while attacking, and had lost majorly, because of the climate, not because of the population.

^correct me if i'm wrong.

 

I assume you are right. No one really has ever been able to take over the Russians, just due to the cold and size of Russia. Except for the Mongols... But their "taking over" was much different than other wars...

 

The US weren't the only people in the war you know...
You act as if the US were the only people in the war, and that they saved the world...

 

how many generations haven't been destroyed over time?
hitler are just an example

 

Stop adding variables to make it possible. You know what I meant, and my point got across.

 

You didn't.
If you have an aryan appearance, almost definitely would you have been captivated by his speeches and words, as others, much cleverer than you, were.

 

I would no doubt be listening to him because he likes me for what I look like. But I wouldn't be brainwashed because of it. If someone gives you a bunch of compliments and tells you how things could be and then tells you to kill everyone that isn't like you. Would you still listen to him or would you not?

Only if someone gave me valid reasons on how I should hate them would I actually do it. Telling someone because they're different from you and they are weaker than you, isn't a valid point.