What do you think about hitler? If you were him, what would you do differently? Do you think he would of taken over the world if the USA didn't stop him in time?
My opinions now
Hitler is extremely smart. He started as nothing at all, was a messenger boy in WWI, and STILL ended up taking over germany and almost the world.
What I would of done differently was not betray Russia, made a treaty with france saying I will give you your land back if you help us fight against the USA. Then fight and win the usa, and take over the world.
If USA waited even 1 more year, hitler would of been successful with his plans of taking over the world.
What are your opinions? Im interested.
Firstly, understand that the USA pictures itself as a far bigger contributor than it actually was. In both World War One and Two the USA refused to step in to help anyone until the enemy attacked them. The USA didn't actually do that much, so don't assume that they did.
Secondly, Hitler was not smart. Contrary to what you suggest, Hitler was actually tactically a failure. What he was good at was manipulating people.
Thirdly, he didn't really "betray" Russia. Both countries signed the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact as a matter of convenience so they could re-build their armies and economies. It was inevitable that it would be broken.
Fourth, your idea to make a pact with France to take out USA is ridiculous. As previously stated, the USA didn't even help much; America is an isolationist nation who doesn't give a shit about anyone else. Germany was actually focuses on Britain and Canada (after he took over most of Europe).
Fifth, Hitler's failure was not greatly affected by America. Hitler doomed himself when he engaged Russia, opening himself for attack on two separate fronts.
Sixth, the States actually fought a lot more against Japan than against Germany. Germany wasn't really attacking them so they could've cared less.
Seventh, if I was Hitler, I would have done what Hitler had done because
I was Hitler. If you meant, "if you were in Hitler's position," then the obvious answer is to simply not attempt to take over the world.
Hitler was an insanely good leader. better than any others today. dont get me worng he killed poeple, and yes thats bad, but im not talking about him killing people. he brought germany out of an economic crisis, germany was in one of the best states it has ever been in when hitler was in power, ge brough money adn jobs. her valued his countrymen, the war was for expanding germany, helping his countrymen. he was not selfish whatsoever./
Oh and that's ridiculous. Hitler was a terrible leader; leading through fear and threat of execution is not a good leader. A good leader inspires people; he doesn't lead so much as show people what they could do.
Hitler didn't really bring Germany out of an economic crisis. War makes every major nation rich; it pulled everyone out of the depression. Hitler didn't do this on purpose.
Hitler was also entirely selfish; he didn't do anything for his people. Just look at the German army; people were shot for minor things, because Hitler
didn't care. He was simply power hungry and self-centered. Even obvious proof exists; "Heil Hitler," "Fuhrer," and the mandatory publication of "Mein Kamph" are easy to see.
If you're talking about great leaders of that time, perhaps you should take a look at Winston Churchill.
