You sir, have no sence of value. I'm meaning to say that most wouldn't want an African-American as for a president simply because of different points in a debate? Half of this country isn't doesn't know what it's up against.
I personaly like Obama's plans better then any other and that doesn't mean that you come and start insulting me just because I have my own opinion?
You are a foolish individual thinking that you know more? Seems to be correct which shows that...
YOU NEED TO GTFO YOURSELF!!
Your the retarted one.
Ahh, nothing like jump-starting a weekend with combatting a little hippocracy. In your first moronic post you inferred that Obama can't be President just because he's not white. Cruel promptly filtered through your poor grammar, refuted your non-existant point, and then said what we all wish idiots like you would do, stop plaguing the conversation.
If your post came from nowhere, you're a fool. If your post was a response to what I said, you're a hardly literate imbecile. I said that MANY PEOPLE FEEL THAT WAY, not that I do. Don't come in here saying we're all too racist when nobody stated that.
Oh, and one more thing, it would be "You're the retarded one." (as in the contraction you are) not "Your the retarded one.", retard.
I am very moderate, i can see both sides ya know?
No, I guess all your worthless spam is keeping me from seeing the point you were going to make... oh wait, there wasn't one.
Oh? I thought he wouldn't even put his hand to his heart
When you're so busy getting a 100 post per day average rather than watching the news, posting irrelevant and idiotic comments is an extreme risk.
Are you being completely serious?
I have my serious doubts about McCain's mental and physical health. Let's face it: He's old.
Also, he supported the war in Iraq, and wants to keep troops there until AT LEAST 2013. Is that viable, given our current debt and economy? Hardly.
Basically, he's a token war veteran.
Agreed on this one. He has no right to be asking people about their religion effecting their ability to be president. If anything, we should be asking HIM how he can go around talking about his service to his chruch and then change gears to better America rather than his faith.
I doubt even you will argue that the man who holds the current record for oldest President was as the very least one of the greatest we've had in the last half century, if not beyond that.
You break it you buy it. We've already had some interesting on this elsewhere though.
I think that Bush has left people very hungry for change, so that over 50% of the population is not racist/sexist.
I just can't honestly see another Republican being voted into office with the current climate.
First, it isn't a war. It's sectarian violence that is generally improving.
Second, what can the military do? It's not a peacekeeping force.
Third, Chuck Norris sucks. He doesn't believe in evolution, and his show (Walker: Texas Ranger) keeps on slipping in right-wing messages (pro-death penalty, as I witnessed today).
I never said anything about 50% of people being the one of the two. I'm saying it's enough people to turn those "close calls" in the election preditions away from the slight lead one or the other holds over Republicans.
If the elections were last year, maybe, but enough people seem to be getting over it for someone to go with the other party just because they aren't Republican (that and the Democratic Congress has screwed up more than enough too). Then again, I can't tell you how many dipshits (dipshits doesn't mean women, I know some men that are too) I've overheard stating they are/aren't going to vote for Clinton or Obama based on race/sex.
I'm going to cut the "generally improving" part of that out and make a scrapbook about it. Just when I abandoned hope of getting you to admit it...
It gives the media something to complain about other than Brittany and her baby.
The only people that watch that show are apperantly you two and old (already pro death penalty) men in senior homes, so it doesn't really matter.
I don't like any biased shows. I don't consider myself an avowed liberal, or an avowed conservative. I consider myself a hey-politicians-cut-the-rhetoric-and-let-me-evaluate-your-logic-in-a-cold-hard-fashion kind of person.
However, you ignored my other points.
No, McCain just gets the parenthesis spot (despite the fact that he had the better win margin) and what you're asking of the politicians in the latter part is against the laws of nature.
Your other points have been argued a bazillion (yes, a bazillion) times in other threads, maybe he was sparing us from a redundant off topic arguement? As you know by now, no such luck with me.
