Flaming Infraction

[gooberboy686]

Dear gooberboy686,

You have received an infraction for Flaming for the content of this post: http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?p=5020916

-------
You have received an infraction at Sythe.org for the following post;

http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=5020916&postcount=3

For; flaming.
Repeated flaming again will result in a temporary ban.
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s).

Accumulating three infractions will result in a two-week ban. Six infractions will result in a month-long ban. Several temporary bans will eventually result in a permanent ban. We suggest that you read and follow the forum rules, which can be found at http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=148431. If you have received an infraction regarding your signature, read http://www.sythe.org/showthread.php?t=360365 to ensure it will not happen again.

If you feel that this infraction was given in error, you may explain why you think so in the Dispute Forum (http://sythe.org/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=324) and a moderator or administrator will review your case and come to a final decision.

Thanks,
Sythe.Org Forums

Jew was right the first time. He gave me an infraction for spamming, which I understand totally. Someone, I assume it was Tribal since he issued this, reversed the spamming infraction and changed it to flaming. If I'm going to be infracted, I want to be infracted properly.

My post was short and I agree that it was basically spam, so I'm willing to be infracted for it.

Repeated flaming again will result in a temporary ban.

I don't want to flame once and have this misplaced fraction get me temporarily banned. My post in no way flamed Finniscool. All the post was there for was to express how long I'd been waiting for him to step down. If I wanted to flame him, I could've done that in a better way. Please reverse this flaming infraction and put back the rightful spamming infraction.

 

[R33l2r3al]

I agree with your dispute. Reversed and reinfracted for spam.