Disputing ban of "Metro boomin" on his behalf

I am disputing the ban of: Metro boomin on his behalf because he is not able to properly articulate why his ban is ridiciulous do to being such a new member.

His ban dispute is: Really @chloe

The only evidence in the case is: Buying rspspk gold

The staff has failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Metro is a scammer. Infact there is no evidence that he is a scammer.

Metro's post can easily be seen as sarcasm or a simple reaction to trolls posting on his thread accusing him of scamming without proof. He also did not in anyway admin to the scam. Saying "good" does not imply agreement with the other person's statement. It also doesn't make any sense for someone to admit to scamming in such a way. They would know that if they admitted to scamming they would be banned so it seems very odd that knowing this someone would post in non-explicit language. The person that reported the so called scam was also a hacked user and is also banned which makes it very likely that they are the scammer and are just causing trouble, not the other way around.

 

He's a big boy, he can make his own dispute. For the record he's also ban evading