Okay so i purchased 1m BM from @Taurine for 20m 07 gp. Once i had purchased the BM i went on to stake a little on the server and won some items. i then went on to sell the items and whilst in a trade i was banned.
screenshot of my account being banned :
Gyazo - 03f957620f2e5fa2a9c466ad88fabb8f.png
me confirming that was the account we were going to do the trade on:
Gyazo - ec237505484935290aade22b22bf829e.png
screenshots of the chat we had when he was selling:
Gyazo - dd68d4eddf5cf741f30a8bc0d09bca21.png
Gyazo - 9f7ac95ad5710747d64c45dd1f6b8efe.png
As you can see in this screenshot he claimed his method had 100% no bans
Gyazo - 69472eeb356070d5d07ac22e3c95f7a8.png
Sticky in the rsps section about bans and risks.
BAN RISK ON RSPS TRADES -- READ THIS
If you cannot demonstrate that the customer understood the risk before purchasing from you then you may be responsible for assets which are lost due to bans. In other words your goods have an implied warranty that they will be fit for purpose until and unless that warranty is actively waived by your customer.
I messaged @Shin on skype to see what he had to say about this and this was his response
[22:57:02] Shin (Alex): According to the rules listed therein, I'd think they would be responsible.
So im asking for the 20m i paid for the 1m BM back. If needed i can give his IP to prove its him along with our skype convo off what he said after i was banned.
screenshot of my account being banned :
Gyazo - 03f957620f2e5fa2a9c466ad88fabb8f.png
me confirming that was the account we were going to do the trade on:
Gyazo - ec237505484935290aade22b22bf829e.png
screenshots of the chat we had when he was selling:
Gyazo - dd68d4eddf5cf741f30a8bc0d09bca21.png
Gyazo - 9f7ac95ad5710747d64c45dd1f6b8efe.png
As you can see in this screenshot he claimed his method had 100% no bans
Gyazo - 69472eeb356070d5d07ac22e3c95f7a8.png
Sticky in the rsps section about bans and risks.
BAN RISK ON RSPS TRADES -- READ THIS
If you cannot demonstrate that the customer understood the risk before purchasing from you then you may be responsible for assets which are lost due to bans. In other words your goods have an implied warranty that they will be fit for purpose until and unless that warranty is actively waived by your customer.
I messaged @Shin on skype to see what he had to say about this and this was his response
[22:57:02] Shin (Alex): According to the rules listed therein, I'd think they would be responsible.
So im asking for the 20m i paid for the 1m BM back. If needed i can give his IP to prove its him along with our skype convo off what he said after i was banned.
Last edited:





















