[DENIED] People shouldn't be allowed to use EX-MOD/ex-admin as a sign of trust

To be honest with you, there have been so many corrupt staff in the past that if you have an ex-mod rank it's a bloody miracle.

I've been pardoned for non scamming related matters; archiving a thread that I knew would be eventually deleted by a rogue and dangerous admin at the time. Does this affect my status?

I think folk should be free to write whatever they want in their title. After all, it's down to the buyer/browser to determine whether [$50 Donor] or [Ex-Mod] deems worthy of 'trust' or not.

 

Sure i'll support this

I personally throw them into my threads but it's just because everyone else does (or the majority) so why not right

Never had to pardon tho YAHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

Support, lots of false trust, make @veng change his thread titles manually please.

 

I have donee quite a few deals with ex mods (none were bad) but i do see where you are going with this. I support this motion

 

I do not support. The evaluation that happens when a staff member is picked is more in depth than that of a CDT member, and thus achieving a CDT rank is much easier than achieving a moderator or administrator rank.

 

I did get the point, however I don’t think you fully grasp the meaning of a pardon. Once pardoned, a user starts with a clean slate and gets the ranks that staff deem necessary back.

That means they are ex-staff and were in a position of trust once upon a time. They should be able to mention this.

 

They were also in position of scammer then we should give them ex-scammer rank too.

 

Totally agree with this, the suggestion is totally wrong. Ex-mod's are like any other person except that they've built 'some' sort of good reputation. I was scammed by one but still don't agree him having his expired title was the cause for it.

They deserve some respect for putting in voluntary work, besides I don't see them often posting in the market section, we have bigger problems than this.


P.S Please dissolve CDT.

 

They were pardoned. What you are indirectly suggesting is dissolving the pardoning system in its entirety, this is in the DNS list.

 

Not letting cdt use the title, fucking retarded. This suggestion, fucking retarded.

Policing this site into the grave LMAO

 

Might aswell forbid putting [DONOR] into thread titles, almost all scammers on here were donors, surely that's a false sense of being trusted?

We should remove fun ranks also lol

 

No support, not important enough issue. Too many rules.

 

I don't put 25$ Into my titles, or vouches. I find it insane the amount of people that put 5$ In their titles Lmfao

 

No support.
@Chloe made a thread concerning the same thing for CDT/PR and you @ABM voted no on the suggestion.
You also used CDT member on your threads as a sign of trust.

Personally I think CDT members and ex staff should be allowed to advertise their respective «ranks» if you will; for their devotion to the community.
You made this thread solely on your vendetta towards Chloe’s thread.

 

Sorry my former post got deleted because I simply said no support. I apologize.

No support because you can use ex-mod, ex-admin, ex-cdt, ex-core anything to boost your own services so to not let ex-admin/ex-mod would just be unfair. This means we would have to ban all. plus, ex-admin is pretty hard to get. Chances are an ex-admin (not banned) is trusted.

I hired someone recently and one of the main reasons was the fact that they had a lot of sythe experience ( that and skill set of course ). It's a good thing when someone reaches high levels of sythe and if they retire from admin or mod, or even currently a mod or admin, let them show off that they made it and know what they are doing.

Think about this. There are multiple users who have PHP, Technical Core, SCAR or whatever, etc ranks. Does this mean those should be removed too? I mean, sythe is handing out badges that say " I know what i'm doing in this language so I can be trusted in this language". It isn't much different so you can see where I am going with this?

As for the comparison of CDT might be a hard sell. CDT is not a mod and nowhere near an admin. I remember CDT members leveraging their CDT rank and donor status too, but at least an admin had to get accepted by a board of other mods and admins. IDK how CDT is elected by it is no where near the strictness of mod applications.

If it was, my 3-4 mod applications would've been accepted by now @Hex lol

 

Friendly reminder people, "I support" = SPAM, please add reasoning to your voting. Its not something i'm really interested giving out infractions for.

 

Anything that personally involves someone looking more trusted than they should equally to someone else I don't find fair so support if so.

By all means, I have nothing wrong with someone being "trusted" an "OMM" or "moderator/admin" but also applies that you should do it with respect to others.

if you have a gold thread and you put "OMM" in the title, not being funny it doesn't mean it should impact your gold sales, so there for pointless to head title.

 

NO SUPPORT, you gain the ex mod status for a reason, you’re voted into hierarchy and must uphold some sort of standard that is above the rest. As many will agree, it’s a free market, you should be able market yourself however you’d like. If you’ve gained a certain achievement, there is no reason you shouldn’t be able to flaunt it.

^ now that I got my “reasoning” this comment should not be deleted.

My personally opinion on gl why you’re trying to shut this down is because of your obsession with putting CDT into your titles was shut down & redacted, along with your denied moderation application. It to me seems like you’re arguing this out of spite. Which is the immaturity here.