Sublime Vs. Nirvana

I posted this awhile ago, but never got a good amount of answers.

Vote please!

 

I've got Two Joints. I'll upload it some time.

 

Ide go sublime purely cause they a heavier band and are not as comercialized as nirvana.............yet...

 

Sublime, simply because I hate Nirvana.

 

subline = heavier band and they pwn

 

Sublime, because...they're sublime..

 

Ha!

I knew you were gonna post on this thread Stephy, and I knew you were going to say Sublime is beter. o.0

Well, so far, the poll is 4 votes Sublime, and 1 vote Nirvana surprisingly?

 

sublime owns

 

Nirvana.

 

Except, I'm Clash, not Steph >_>

 

Nirvana, music is means alot to me. Sublime is good though, personally Nirvana means more tho

 

My mistake, your user title confuses me.

 

You're comparing two totally different genres here.
Sublime was simply punk, Nirvana was grunge.
Nirvana takes my vote due to the fact that they all put their hearts into their music, unlike Sublime.
Calling Sublime heavy? Are you kidding?

 

He was comparing this;

I am going to have to go with Nirvana though, they had way better hits than Sublime. Both very good bands though.

 

walk on home does have a point, sublime isnt that heavy and they are both completly different genres.... I do love the sublime t shirts though meh, im still slipknot all the way...cause i loooove their Iowa album....

 

I've got to say Nirvana. I love his voice and the songs. It's different to music to what i usually listen to.

 

He was making a comparison that had no relevance to the music itself.
Anyways...Whoever said Sublime was heavy...Listen to Pantera, then tell me 90's punk is heavy.

 

Maybe I'm just dumb, but for a lot of your links I get this message.

Code:

The url contained a malformed video id. 

 

Nirvana, I like most of their tunes.