What's better in pvp [VOTE]

Discussion in 'RuneScape Miscellaneous' started by james909, Jul 30, 2010.

?

What pure is the best?

Poll closed Aug 29, 2010.
  1. 1 att 99 str 1 def 60 hp

    11.1%
  2. 20 att 99 str 1 def 60 hp

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 60 att 99 str 94 mage 1 def 90 range

    88.9%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
What's better in pvp [VOTE]
  1. Unread #1 - Jul 30, 2010 at 11:43 AM
  2. james909
    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Posts:
    229
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    james909 Active Member
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    So what do you think is a better pure for pking?

    1)
    1 Attack
    99 Strength
    1 Defence
    60 hp
    1 mage/range
    2)
    20 att
    99 str
    1 def
    1 mage/range
    60 hp
    3)
    60 att
    99 str
    1 def
    94 mage
    90 range
    90 hp

    Vote!
     
  3. Unread #2 - Jul 30, 2010 at 6:57 PM
  4. smokie2o9
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2008
    Posts:
    322
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    smokie2o9 Forum Addict

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3rd choice no competition. lol
     
  5. Unread #3 - Jul 30, 2010 at 7:04 PM
  6. Greg
    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2008
    Posts:
    2,470
    Referrals:
    6
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Greg Retired
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    I agree and the poll agrees too, really those stats are idea, claw it up, just dont be a gay rusher kthxbai
     
  7. Unread #4 - Jul 30, 2010 at 8:27 PM
  8. terminatorz
    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    Posts:
    164
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    terminatorz Active Member
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3) obviously
     
  9. Unread #5 - Jul 30, 2010 at 11:32 PM
  10. ilikepie1
    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Posts:
    952
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    ilikepie1 Apprentice

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    Is this strictly members pvp?

    If not, I would say 40 att, 90+ strength, 90+ range would be ideal for F2P.
    You can easily switch between range and melee and still have time to finish with a 2h.
     
  11. Unread #6 - Aug 1, 2010 at 4:35 AM
  12. jazmer1
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Posts:
    371
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    jazmer1 Forum Addict
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3rd choice of course.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Aug 1, 2010 at 6:09 AM
  14. Quickz
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Posts:
    450
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Quickz Forum Addict
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    Last one ofc, easy to combo etc.
     
  15. Unread #8 - Aug 1, 2010 at 6:42 AM
  16. Gdapro
    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Posts:
    157
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Gdapro Active Member
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3rd easy...
     
  17. Unread #9 - Aug 1, 2010 at 8:39 AM
  18. Lazy Money
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Posts:
    298
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Lazy Money Forum Addict

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3rd option why else?
     
  19. Unread #10 - Aug 1, 2010 at 10:57 AM
  20. JRD2938
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2010
    Posts:
    60
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    JRD2938 Member

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3rd option
     
  21. Unread #11 - Aug 1, 2010 at 11:25 AM
  22. Usa
    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Posts:
    1,666
    Referrals:
    129
    Sythe Gold:
    714
    Wait, do you not have an Archer rank? (2) Potamus

    Usa The one and only.
    $200 USD Donor

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    1 99 1 with 60 hp

    it's like a shock account, hits very high at its low level and most pures arent ready for it. I have one that is 1 99 1 with 70 hp and i must say, its a lot of fun to pk on.
     
  23. Unread #12 - Aug 1, 2010 at 11:59 AM
  24. inurballs
    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Posts:
    406
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    inurballs Forum Addict
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    20-99-1 is far more enjoyable for me, when i was an obby mauler everybody safed cause of the slow maul, i had to ko ppl by getting my recoil down him to 3/4 hp and then hit a 420
     
  25. Unread #13 - Aug 1, 2010 at 12:09 PM
  26. Jos van der berg
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Posts:
    117
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Jos van der berg Active Member
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    60 att 99 str 94 mage 90 range, and get dt so you can cast barrage:D or venguance ofc.
     
  27. Unread #14 - Aug 2, 2010 at 4:07 AM
  28. canipkzlik1337
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2010
    Posts:
    14
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    canipkzlik1337 Newcomer

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    last option all the way its teh sht!
     
  29. Unread #15 - Aug 2, 2010 at 5:15 AM
  30. THE LAP
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Posts:
    406
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    5

    THE LAP Forum Addict

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3rd option is over rated, having had those stats you get raped by complete noobs. 78-80ish combat and rarely hit on def (80% of your oponents) + 1 def gets hit on like candy. its probably a bit better now with not as much torso/void.

    + any other pures your level will have 1337 stats and its basically hit, hit spec, hope your the victor ~ not alot of skill or enjoyment.

    so i'd go with #2 being the most ownage option, but #1 being best 'value for money'.
     
  31. Unread #16 - Aug 3, 2010 at 1:38 AM
  32. M I K E
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2010
    Posts:
    1,829
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    M I K E Guru
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    Third option most definitely -
    I'd love to have a maxed out pure.
     
  33. Unread #17 - Aug 4, 2010 at 10:03 AM
  34. ieat brainz
    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Posts:
    35
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    ieat brainz Member
    Banned

    What's better in pvp [VOTE]

    3 my pure is same stat and .owns.
     
< Client AutoClickers. | wow im pissed off.............. >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site