Bans with no proof.

I've seen it happening a lot lately, people have been getting banned for no reason whatsoever with mods having no proof. Sin666 apparently got a bug up her ass about me and cant understand the meaning of PROXY. She has no proof that I hacked Giddy and I didnt hack Giddy. I have no fucking idea whats going on with Giddy and theres no way you could have proved that I did it. I put two disputes in, guess who did them both, you got it sin666. A second dispute should be put in by another mod not the same one over and over. Thats just stupid, because she thinks she has some "proof" that I did it, and no one else sees it I just get to stay banned? I have to say Im dissapointed with sythe because of this.

 

I'm 100% positive she would not ban without proof. She isn't like that.

But now you are ban evading...

 

So what if im ban evading, she told me all of my further disputes were going to be ignored. Why not inform people of the shit thats going on?

 

Anyone who has actually seen the proof on the people I ban know that, while I issue quite a few of them and am firm on the ones I do issue, I do not ban prematurely.

You figure the probabilities right, and there's less than a one in a million chance you're innocent. By the laws of, "beyond reasonable doubt," I'll call that proof.

 

1. "Sin666 apparently got a bug up her ass"
3. Pretty clear posting 4 disputes one after another won't make a difference.
7. Your ip is your problem; you choosing to use a proxy linked to other banned accounts is your problem unless you have something to back up why it was used, which you have no reason to be using it.
10. Look at #3.

 

Back seat modding.

 

This isn't going to get you any further.

 

nonotrly.

Was just clarifying without any knowlage of proof why he/she can remain banned. If me quoting the rules is backseat modding, then lol.