Binary Logic

I have been in many arguments with people and have witnessed tons of irrational points of views. Some people simply aren't capable of deep thought and to take all variables into account which leads to logical fallacies, and which eventually leads to wars. This is the main problem with democracy, it doesn't work with a retarded citizen rate.

Binary logic is processing with two options, 1 or 0, yes or no. With arguments involving ethics and morals, we need to find without a doubt what the right thing to do is. Just like there is no doubt that 2+2=4, I believe we can have no doubt about what seems right and wrong in politics and in life. Right now, these principles are only applied to mathematics, but what is mathematics? It is the science of structure, order, and relation. And most of us can agree that the world today is nearly completely void of structure and order. But what if these principles were applied to logic and real life?

All there is now is a bunch of irrational arguing between people, which always leads to nothing. It is no secret that in an argument, rarely does someone admit that they are wrong. Especially in the highest level of argument, politics, admitting defeat could cost a candidate a seat in the house or senate. If someone admits that they are wrong, people would rely less on them, and in result not vote for them. Therefore politicians rarely admit they are wrong, no matter how wrong they are for the sake of their career. But what if we needed not to rely on a person in this situation, but instead on a set of ideas that already answered all of these questions. A Philosophical framework, sort of like a constitution of logic, where all variables i.e. people, situation, are put into an equation, and the outcome is the answer, as in 4 is the answer to 2+2. But of course people need to be able to understand this constitution and comprehend it, which would only require a basic education in philosophy and logistics. A classroom that teaches people how to think properly, without bias and other logical fallacies.

The knowledge of decision theory and maximization of utility would let people make much better decisions in their life, and in result live a much better life. Formal education today is a bunch of crap, all that is exercised is simple memorization and test taking skills, which is again, a bunch of CRAP. The brain is capable of so much more than that, but of course knowledge is power, and if the world leaders let us acquire this power, they would most likely be booted out.

But back to the education reform and the constitution. These ideas would have to be taught to every human, to prevent from only the select few who could understand these ideas of changing the constitution for their own good, like the top political leaders of today screw over its citizens out of all their money and freedom. We all know that knowledge is power, and since everyone would have this knowledge, the chances of the rich taking over the government and enslaving the people would be very poor.

The ultimate truth would finally be known, political arguments would be diffused, and people would know how to better interact with each other, all with a simple understanding of thought processes.