Best method to stake and make bank

I'm sure alot of you like staking, but always end up getting cleaned amiright??!!??

I've done this many times and always left the duel arena with more than I came with, no matter what you do you will end up on top if you follow this and don't stray from this pattern.

Start with x15 your original bet. So 75m is a good starting point. (5m bet)

Bet 5m until you win, once you win bet 10m until you lose, and then bet 5m until you win again, and carry on the pattern.

Here's an example of a stake log; Starting with 75m (+/win -/loss)
1. -5m = 70m
2. -5m = 65m
3. -5m = 60m
4. +5m = 65m
5. +10m = 75m
6. +10m = 85m
7. +10m = 95m
8. +10m = 105m
9. -10m = 95m
10. +5m = 100m
11. -10m = 90m
12. -5m = 85m
13. -5m = 80m
14. +5m = 85m
15. +10m = 95m
16. -10m = 85m
17. +5m = 90m
18. +10m = 100m
19. -10m = 90m
20. +5m = 95m

With 11 wins and 9 losses, you end up with 20m after 20 stakes... that's pretty good.

By following this method you will never get cleaned, you could theoretically end up negative if you have a very very long losing streak... but that's just shitty mate haha.

Logically, if you use this you will end up on top because you profit more on your winning streaks than you lose on your losing streaks. And that's how the duel arena works... you usually win a couple in a row and lose a couple with the occasional long streaks of 5-10 in a row.

Good luck lads and tell me how much you win using this technique!

 

That method is 100% just gambling with 50/50 odds no different than double up method unless you have an advantage it is always 50/50

 

this is not doubling up.... lol

doubling up method is always betting x2 -.-

and yes, the duel arena is 50/50 odds but have you ever gone there and won one lost one 100 times in a row? no... there is always win streaks and loss streaks. With this method you will profit because you WIN MORE on the win streaks than you LOSE on the losing streaks.

Read the thread mate

 

I read the thread I compared it to doubling up, I did not say it was doubling up.

Streaks are still 100% random if I flip a coin 50 times and its heads 50 times if I flip it again it still had a 50% change of being either heads or tails. same with streaks if you have won 5 times you have 50% chance of winning or losing if you lose 5 times you have 50% chance of winning or losing.

I would not reply on this method, that is all I am saying.

 

Correct. Thank you for proving my point. Streaks are random, and the odds are always 50%. So theoretically you should have the same amount of win streaks as loss streaks, therefore you will PROFIT.

 

Odds are 50:50. Probability is a totally different thing. We're allowed a variable, which is how much we bet. Which means you CAN actually control the outcome. Casinos have rules in place that do not allow doubling up, and also tables have max bets. This is because the martingale strategy is a 100% way to always make make money if you follow it and have an infinite amount of money to use. The probability of you losing 20 times in a row is extremely extremely low, I don't wanna do the math, but it's many decimal places. Yes it can happen. But casinos don't allow the abuse of probability for a good reason. No rules in the arena.

 

To further explain, you shouldn't be betting on a single stake at 50:50 odds. That would make you stupid. You should be betting on losing xx amount of games in a row and manipulating your cash stack to always come out on top.

 

I just flipped a coin 32 times (28 at first but I got too many losses so added 4 wins on the end)

2 , 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2 , 2, 1, 1, 1 , 1

95 100,90,95,85,80,85,95,105,115,105,100,95,100,90,95, 85, 80,, 75,,80, 70 75 65 70 80 70 65 60 65 75 85 95

2 stands for loss 1 for win.

streaks are random you could just as easily get win loss win loss win loss win loss 100 times in a row as you would 50 wins 50 losses the first outcome you would lose your bank the second you would make bank but it is completely random.

streaks are not real things they are a name we have given to something.

Please flip a coin 20 times and see the results then with the same results make all the loses be wins.

like: w,w,w,l,l,w,l,w,l,w,w,l,l,l,w,l,w,l,w,l
l,,l,l,w,,w,l,w,l,w,l,l,w,w,w,l,w,l,w,l,w

Repeat this by 5-10 times and it all simply evens out.

You are just as likely to streak losses as wins, I agree. But this does not mean if you lose 5 times in a row during testing 100 fights you will then find that you streak for 5 wins in the same 100 fight data.

It could be that you win 5 lose 2 win 1 lose 1 win 1 win loss win loss win loss win loss loss win loss loss win win loss win loss and so on.

 

You do not need to find that 5 wins in the 100 tests. You need to double your money 5x... simple minds will always argue martingale, but it's proven.

 

Please note I am not arguing his strategy is correct, because it isnt.

 

Pretty much without going into the actual probability shit and all that mumbo jumbo, if you follow this method you will be MORE likely to come out on top than get cleaned. You would have to be EXTREMELY unlucky to get cleaned.

 

That system does not work either, because guess how I lost my 7b from betting 50m then 100 then 200 then 400 then 800 1.6 3.2 then the rest even if I had started with 10m

10,20,40,80,160,320,640,1280,2560,5b, cleaned thats only a few more stakes and can happen you end up risking bills for a few mill it is not worth it.

This is why I no longer stake.

For op please flip a coin 20-50 times (until you end up on even amount if you do not end up even by 40 then just add on a bunch of losses or wins)

count all heads as wins all tails losses

then count all tails as wins all heads losses

it will even out to be something like 120m total or 80m total 110m total 90m total its always 50/50

 

The system works flawlessly. You just did it wrong lol.

 

Please tell me how I should do it and if it works so well you should honestly buy 10 maxed accounts and simply use it all day just watch the money pile up.

 

Because you can lose a couple hundred times in a row with 7b starting at 1m and not get cleaned using martingale. You started too high, or tried to make too much money after losses along the way. Greed. Casinos don't allow it because it's a flawless method lol. Go to a casino and try to double up on a 50:50 table. They'll tell you you cant. They'll also have table caps. Which don't allow you to bet above x amount, so you can't do this.

 

And once I'm maxed with 100m stack, I'll gladly pm you and show you gains. Done it before, just got back into rs. It's not gonna be like what you think where I'm going in and betting 500m and winning because Im pro. It's gonna be extremely small bets that add up over time.

 

1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4048,cleaned
1,2,3,4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,, 12 13

That is not a couple hundred thats 13. What is the "correct" way to do that system?

 

Start lower than 1m dude. Lmao. It's mathematics. Not a ragey 13 year old kid that lost 7 grand on runescape. Facts. I was giving an example.

Also after many months of hosting commission stakes a while ago, the highest loss streak I saw was 17. Chances of losing 13 in a row are again, many decimal places.

 

it was eoc not 7 grand who said I raged I simply used the system. and if I'm doing less then 1m what the hell is the point? 100k stakes? even then 100,200,400,800,1.6 then just do the same math again 17 losses. and if you say 100k is too high then I have no clue the money per hour would not be worth it at all.

 

Im saying you're rarely going to lose 13 in a row. So there's profit in there waiting for that time. You could have bought a double ups worth of gold. I never said you can go in there with a thousand dollars worth of gold and make money. You do need a tremendous amount of gold. I was wrong about the hundreds I exaggerated and said it wrong. The chances of you losing 13 in a row gives you hundreds of chances to not do that, because of the chance that you losing that many in a row is so low, so you can go hundreds of games before you lose that many in a row. My whole point is martingale is mathematically the only and best way to cut even, or make money with 50:50 odds.