[BANNED] 100% Evidence against Regulation

Discussion in 'Dispute Forum Archive' started by Tenguage12, Feb 28, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
[BANNED] 100% Evidence against Regulation
  1. Unread #1 - Feb 28, 2010 at 10:08 PM
  2. Tenguage12
    Referrals:
    0

    Tenguage12 Guest

    [BANNED] 100% Evidence against Regulation

    Once you review each of these pictures, that has taken me time to get, with a little manipulation, and a help of a friend, who was friends with Regulations.

    I officially have fully utterly 100% evidence so that I cam be unbanned, and Regulation NEVER allowed back..

    Secondly, I found out that Regulation was banned before for scamming, thus being banned now due to Ban Evading. Now.. Here is all my evidence.

    EVIDENCE REPORT:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    (MORE) EVIDENCE REPORT:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    (MORE) EVIDENCE (Picture came straight from Regulation to my friend):

    [​IMG]

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I would very much my TwC, and my ban to be lifted. I would very much appreciate this, and I apologies for being angry, I was just mad that some scamming noob was able to lie and individuals believed it, especially considering it was a RuneScape account.

    Thank you.
    -Tengauge12
     
  3. Unread #2 - Feb 28, 2010 at 10:38 PM
  4. Sin666
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Posts:
    6,989
    Referrals:
    21
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    Two Factor Authentication User Detective Heidy

    Sin666 Hero
    Crabby Retired Administrator

    [BANNED] 100% Evidence against Regulation

    I have yet to make a decision about the convo, but Bewood is not a reliable source.

    The "original" image he was supposedly given is itself a forgery.

    Meanwhile, the "edited" screenshot Reg posted shares none of the same amateur editing fails. Thus, if the proof is fake, I'm quite sure Bewood had nothing to do with it.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Mar 1, 2010 at 1:19 AM
  6. Farcast
    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Posts:
    11,754
    Referrals:
    75
    Sythe Gold:
    499
    Steam Account Verifier Sythe's 10th Anniversary Community Participant

    Farcast Lord
    Retired Global Moderator Zombie $50 USD Donor

    [BANNED] 100% Evidence against Regulation

    Well, I was in a chat earlier with tengauge12 and Regulation-X when Regulation-X openly admitted to getting the logs edited in order to get tengauge into trouble. He goes on to say how tengauge did nothing wrong and agreed that he is completely innocent in this case. An interesting piece of evidence nonetheless.

    [​IMG]
     
  7. Unread #4 - Mar 1, 2010 at 1:49 AM
  8. Sin666
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Posts:
    6,989
    Referrals:
    21
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    Two Factor Authentication User Detective Heidy

    Sin666 Hero
    Crabby Retired Administrator

    [BANNED] 100% Evidence against Regulation

    I've heard quite enough bullshit.

    I was just in a convo with them. Reg asked for Tengauge to be unbanned, saying he got refunded this morning. I told him it wasn't going to happen until this issue about faked proof and logs was resolved. He said the conversations were the same, but that Ten's just didn't show everything - I had to actually point out the differences to him. Does it really sound like he edited them?

    Also, as stated above, Bewood didn't edit anything. He quite clearly proved himself incapable of doing so (and has since acknowledged his edit fail, admitting he faked it because 'he didn't save the real one'). Reg is only going along with it because he knows its the only way Tengauge will be unbanned. Why would he want Tengauge unbanned if just last night he was asking me whether his own ban would invalidate his report? Given that he was paid this morning, you tell me.
     
< Dispute | Ban Yoyotw666 Now Plz >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site